Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 1336
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 1336.11 (2026)

Citing chapter

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter may be cited as the Ohio uniform fraudulent transfer act.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1968–2016 · leading case: Locafrance United States Corp. v. Interstate Distrib. Servs., Inc., 451 N.E.2d 1222 (Ohio 1983).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Locafrance United States Corp. v. Interstate Distrib. Servs., Inc., 451 N.E.2d 1222 (Ohio 1983). · cites it 6× “2 *201 However, the courts below found that R.C. 1336.11 broadens the scope of the Act to permit the application of the law of fraud which allows such awards in appropriate cases.”
Premier Therapy, L.L.C v. Childs, 2016 Ohio 7934 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “” See R.C. 1336.11 (titling the act). {¶109} Pursuant to R.”
Profeta v. Lombardo, 600 N.E.2d 360 (Ohio Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 3× “10 2 and former R.C. 1336.11 3 states that the principles of law and equity supplement the sections in the chapter.”
Famous Supply Co. v. Cent. Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. (In Re Cent. Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.), 64 B.R. 733 (N.D. Ohio 1986). · cites it 2× “Granting that Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 1336.11 (Page 1979) provides that a panoply of substantive law governs in cases not provided for by the Ohio Fraudulent Conveyance Act, it does not allow a plaintiff to assert common law causes of action which have not been pled.”
Wagner v. Galipo, 553 N.E.2d 610 (Ohio 1990). “” R.C. 1336.11, not cited by either party, also provides support for our holding.”
Malone v. Summer & Co., 244 N.E.2d 485 (Ohio Ct. App. 1968). · cites it 2× “09, Eevised Code, outlining the remedies available to attain recovery is not too clear, but the intent of the chapter is clearer after reading Section 1336.11, Eevised Code, which reads as follows: “In any case not provided for in Sections 1336.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.