(A) No person, except as authorized by law, shall treat a human corpse in a way that the person knows would outrage reasonable family sensibilities.
(B) No person, except as authorized by law, shall treat a human corpse in a way that would outrage reasonable community sensibilities.
(C) Whoever violates division (A) of this section is guilty of abuse of a corpse, a misdemeanor of the second degree. Whoever violates division (B) of this section is guilty of gross abuse of a corpse, a felony of the fifth degree.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 123
cases (51 in the last 5 years), 1984–2026 · leading case: State v. Condon, 789 N.E.2d 696 (Ohio Ct. App. 1st Dist. 2003).
State v. Condon, 789 N.E.2d 696 (Ohio Ct. App. 1st Dist. 2003). · cites it 29דThis case is about the manner in which Condon took the photographs, and his treatment of the corpses in doing so; it is no way a prosecution based upon the message he sought to express.”
State v. Hopfer, 679 N.E.2d 321 (Ohio Ct. App. 2d Dist. 1996). · cites it 8ד” Hopfer contends that R.C. 2927.01, abuse of a corpse, is unconstitutionally vague and that the trial court should have dismissed that charge against her.”
State v. McKelton (Slip Opinion), 2016-Ohio-5735, 70 N.E.3d 508. · cites it 2ד25(A); gross abuse of her corpse, R.C. 2927.01(B); aggravated robbery and aggravated arson, R.”
State v. Gardner, 582 N.E.2d 1014 (Ohio Ct. App. 6th Dist. 1989). · cites it 21דThe trial court erred in denying the appellant’s motion to dismiss on the grounds that O.R.C. § 2927.01 is unconstitutionally vague.”
State v. Glover, 479 N.E.2d 901 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 1984). · cites it 8דThe state appeals from the trial court’s pretrial dismissal of the indictment against defendant for gross abuse of a corpse (R.C. 2927.01[B]). The state claims that the trial court erred by finding the applicable statute unconstitutionally vague.”
State v. Whitaker, 2022-Ohio-2840, 207 N.E.3d 677. · cites it 2ד{¶ 79} Gross abuse of a corpse is defined in R.C. 2927.01(B): “No person, except as authorized by law, shall treat a human corpse in a way that would outrage reasonable community sensibilities.”
State v. Knuff, 2024-Ohio-902, 239 N.E.3d 259. · cites it 2ד01(B) Count 12 Gross abuse of a corpse (Mann), in violation of R.C. 2927.01(B) Count 13 Breaking and entering (of Classic Hair Studio), in violation of R.”
State v. Sapp, 2004-Ohio-7008, 822 N.E.2d 1239. · cites it 2ד12(A)(1), and three counts of abusing a corpse pursuant to R.C. 2927.01(B). Two arson counts were severed before trial.”
State v. Jones, 2019-Ohio-2134. · cites it 2ד12, and one count of gross abuse of a corpse in violation of R.C. 2927.01. The aggravated burglary, aggravated robbery, kidnapping, aggravated murder and murder counts contained firearm specifications in violation of R.”
State v. Myers (Slip Opinion), 2018-Ohio-1903, 114 N.E.3d 1138. “31(A)) Count 9 abuse of a corpse (R.C. 2927.01(B)) with a firearm specification *1157 {¶ 37} The jury found Myers guilty on all counts and specifications.”
State v. Warfel, 2017-Ohio-5766. · cites it 12ד{¶4} On August 4, 2015, the Medina County Grand Jury indicted Warfel on one count of gross abuse of a corpse in violation of R.C. 2927.01(B), a fifth-degree felony, and one count of tampering with evidence in violation of R.”
State v. Hardin, 2024-Ohio-2943. · cites it 12ד11, felonies of the fifth degree, nine counts of abuse of a corpse, in violation of R.C. 2927.01, felonies of the fifth degree, nine counts of representation as a funeral director while unlicensed, in violation of R.”
State v. Gardner, 582 N.E.2d 1014 (Ohio Ct. App. 6th Dist. 1989). “The trial court erred in denying the appellant’s motion to dismiss on the grounds that O.R.C. § 2927.01 is unconstitutionally vague.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2927.01(B): 105 cases
State v. Condon, 789 N.E.2d 696 (Ohio Ct. App. 1st Dist. 2003). “This case is about the manner in which Condon took the photographs, and his treatment of the corpses in doing so; it is no way a prosecution based upon the message he sought to express.”
State v. McKelton (Slip Opinion), 2016-Ohio-5735, 70 N.E.3d 508. “25(A); gross abuse of her corpse, R.C. 2927.01(B); aggravated robbery and aggravated arson, R.”
State v. Whitaker, 2022-Ohio-2840, 207 N.E.3d 677. “{¶ 79} Gross abuse of a corpse is defined in R.C. 2927.01(B): “No person, except as authorized by law, shall treat a human corpse in a way that would outrage reasonable community sensibilities.”
State v. Knuff, 2024-Ohio-902, 239 N.E.3d 259. “01(B) Count 12 Gross abuse of a corpse (Mann), in violation of R.C. 2927.01(B) Count 13 Breaking and entering (of Classic Hair Studio), in violation of R.”
State v. Sapp, 2004-Ohio-7008, 822 N.E.2d 1239. “12(A)(1), and three counts of abusing a corpse pursuant to R.C. 2927.01(B). Two arson counts were severed before trial.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.