Either parent of a child who is the subject of an administrative support order may object to the order by bringing an action for the payment of support and provision for the child's health care under section 2151.231 of the Revised Code in the juvenile court or other court with jurisdiction under section 2101.022 or 2301.03 of the Revised Code of the county in which the child support enforcement agency that issues the order is located. The action shall be brought not later than fourteen days after the date of the issuance of the administrative support order. The administrative support order shall remain in effect during the pendency of the objection unless a party requests and is granted a stay by the court. The administrative support order is final and enforceable by a court o r child support enforcement agency fourteen days after the order is issued and may be modified only as provided in Chapters 3119., 3121., and 3123. of the Revised Code.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2011–2026 · leading case: In re J.M.G., 2013-Ohio-2693.
In re J.M.G., 2013-Ohio-2693. · cites it 8ד’s objections to the administrative order filed on December 8, 2009, were untimely, having been filed outside the 30-day time period prescribed by R.C. 3111.84. As such, R.B.’s objections were denied.”
In re I.L.J., 2019-Ohio-5241. · cites it 6ד60(B) “cannot provide an alternative to the procedure outlined in R.C. 3111.84 because [the rule] does not apply to administrative orders.”
In re I.L.J., 2016-Ohio-7052. · cites it 2ד3(C) provides the identical language and refers to R.C. 3111.84. and enforceable because father did not contest administrative order until more than 30 days after the order was issued); Jefferson Cty.”
In re S.H.O., 2019-Ohio-645. “” Further, R.C. 3111.84 provides that a parent subject to an administrative support order may object to the order by bringing an action for the payment of support and provision for the child's health care under section 2151.”
McCombs v. Blackert, 2011-Ohio-5079. “On September 20, 2002, the trial court ratified the administrative child support order, making the child support order an order of the court pursuant to R.C. 3111.84. (Doc. No. 2). {¶5} On February 12, 2004, an agreed judgment entry was filed, which stated that the parties were…”
Miano v. Evans, 2022-Ohio-1042. · cites it 3דMiano objected to the administrative support order pursuant to R.C. 3111.84 by filing an action for a child support order under R.”
In re Z.M., 2019-Ohio-1192. · cites it 2ד2 {¶ 26} Pursuant to R.C. 3111.84, the father of a child who is the subject of an administrative support order may object to the order by bringing an action in the juvenile court under R.”
In re J-L.H, 2014-Ohio-1245. “{¶29} R.C. 3111.84 provides: The mother or father of a child who is the subject of an administrative support order may object to the order by bringing an action for the payment of support and provision for the child’s health care under section 2151.”
In re N.R., 2026-Ohio-1873. “Pursuant to R.C. 3111.84, Father filed timely objections to the administrative order in the Cuyahoga County Juvenile Court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.