The board of education of each school district shall be a body politic and corporate, and, as such, capable of suing and being sued, contracting and being contracted with, acquiring, holding, possessing, and disposing of real and personal property, and taking and holding in trust for the use and benefit of such district, any grant or devise of land and any donation or bequest of money or other personal property.
Cincinnati City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ. v. Conners, 2012 Ohio 2447 (Ohio 2012). · cites it 4דR.C. 3313.17 states, “The board of education of each school district shall be a body politic and corporate, and, as such, capable of * * * contracting and being contracted with, acquiring, holding possessing, and disposing of real and personal property * * *.”
Beifuss v. Westerville Bd. of Educ., 525 N.E.2d 20 (Ohio 1988). · cites it 3דR.C. 3313.17 provides that “[t]he board of education of each school district shall be a body politic and corporate, and, as such, capable of suing and being sued, contracting and being contracted with * * *.”
Betscher v. Governing Bd. of Putnam Cty. Educ. Serv. Ctr., 2015 Ohio 4727 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 8דThe board of the educational service center shall file a copy of each contract entered into under this section with the department of education by the first day the contract is in effect. The ability of the PCESC to contract with the Commissioners was not impossible prior to R.”
Carney v. Cleveland Heights-Univ. Heights City Sch. Dist., 758 N.E.2d 234 (Ohio Ct. App. 2001). “See, R.C. 3313.17. Moreover, an action against the board must be brought against it in its corporate capacity and not against the individual members of the board.”
Brown v. Bd. of Educ., 253 N.E.2d 767 (Ohio 1969). · cites it 4ד17, Revised Code, reads: “The board of education of each school district shall be a body politic and corporate, and, as such, capable of suing and being sued, contracting and being contracted with, acquiring, holding, possessing, and disposing of real and personal property, and…”
Ziegler v. Wendel Poultry Servs., Inc., 615 N.E.2d 1022 (Ohio 1993). “We stated: “According to R.C. 3313.17, a board of education is ‘ * * * á body politic and corporate, and, as such, capable of suing and being sued * * *.”
McGath v. Hamilton Local Sch. Dist., 848 F. Supp. 2d 831 (S.D. Ohio 2012). · cites it 2דOhio Rev.Code § 3313.17 provides that “the board of education of each school district shall be a body politic and corporate, and, as such, capable of suing and being sued.”
Mollette v. Portsmouth City Council, 863 N.E.2d 1092 (Ohio Ct. App. 2006). “03 (state teachers retirement board); R.C. 3313.17 (boards of education); R.C. 4901.”
Houck v. Bd. of Park Commissioners, 876 N.E.2d 1210 (Ohio 2007). “The court determined that a school board, under R.C. 3313.17, had authority to acquire, hold, possess, and dispose of real property.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.