Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 4509
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 4509.17 (2026)

License suspension upon failure to request hearing or deposit security

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
January 1, 2004
Latest Legislation:
Senate Bill 123 - 124th General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

Except as provided in sections 4509.01 to 4509.78 of the Revised Code, upon failure of any person to request a hearing as provided for in section 4509.13 of the Revised Code or to deposit the security required under section 4509.12 of the Revised Code within thirty days after the registrar of motor vehicles has sent the notice provided for in section 4509.13 of the Revised Code, the registrar shall impose a class F suspension of the person's driver's license, commercial driver's license, temporary instruction permit, probationary license, or nonresident operating privilege for the period of time specified in division (B)(6) of section 4510.02 of the Revised Code on the person and the registrations of all motor vehicles owned by the person. If the person is a nonresident, the suspension shall include the privilege of operating any motor vehicle within this state or permitting the operation within this state of any motor vehicle owned by the nonresident.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1960–1982 · leading case: State v. Morrison, 442 N.E.2d 114 (Ohio Ct. App. 9th Dist. 1982).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Morrison, 442 N.E.2d 114 (Ohio Ct. App. 9th Dist. 1982). · cites it 5× “Gary Morrison appeals his conviction for driving while his license was suspended pursuant to R.C. 4509.17 and driving on an expired license in separate incidents.”
Iszczukiewicz v. Universal Underwriters Ins., 182 F. Supp. 733 (N.D. Ohio 1960). “13) that if the required deposit is not made an order of suspension will be made as provided in § 4509.17. But the provisions of §§ 4509.”
Trolio v. McLendon, 211 N.E.2d 65 (Ohio Ct. App. 1965). · cites it 2× “Therefore, if Henry Higgins, the insured, would not have liability insurance, it is my understanding that he would be subject to the Financial Responsibility Law under the circumstances of this case, and if the judgment in this ease on behalf of plaintiff-appellee against Joe…”
Babcock v. Bureau of Motor Vehs., 345 N.E.2d 625 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 1975). · cites it 2× “Section 4509.17, Revised Code, authorizes the Registrar of Motor Vehicles, upon the failure of an owner to deposit the security as determined and required under Section 4509.”
Iszczukiewicz v. Universal Underwriters Ins., 86 Ohio Law. Abs. 216 (N.D. Ohio 1960). · cites it 2× “13, Revised Code), that if the required deposit is not made, an order of suspension will be made as provided in Section 4509.17, Revised Code. But the provisions of Sections 4509.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.