The department of transportation may place and maintain traffic control devices, conforming to its manual and specifications, upon all state highways as are necessary to indicate and to carry out sections 4511.01 to 4511.78 and 4511.99 of the Revised Code, or to regulate, warn, or guide traffic.
No local authority shall place or maintain any traffic control device upon any highway under the jurisdiction of the department except by permission of the director of transportation.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 30
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1955–2024 · leading case: State v. Turner (Slip Opinion), 2020-Ohio-6773, 170 N.E.3d 842.
State v. Turner (Slip Opinion), 2020-Ohio-6773, 170 N.E.3d 842. · cites it 6דR.C. 4511.10 gives ODOT authority to “place and maintain traffic control devices, conforming to its manual and specifications, upon all state highways as are necessary to indicate and to carry out sections 4511.”
Bussard v. Ohio Dep't of Transp., 507 N.E.2d 1179 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 1986). · cites it 3דThe statute plaintiffs would have this court hold creates a specific duty is R.C. 4511.10, which provides in part: “The department of transportation may place and maintain traffic control devices, conforming to its manual and specifications, upon all state highways as are…”
State v. Carano, 2013-Ohio-1633. · cites it 6ד) R.C. 4511.10 pertains to the placement and maintenance of traffic control devices on state highways.”
Rhodus v. Ohio Dep't of Transp., 588 N.E.2d 864 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 1990). “” Moreover, R.C. 4511.10 provides that ODOT “ * * * may place and maintain traffic control devices, conforming to its manual and specifications, upon all state highways as are necessary to indicate and carry out sections 4511.”
Perkins v. Ohio Dep't of Transp., 584 N.E.2d 794 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 1989). · cites it 2דR.C. 4511.10 provides in pertinent part that “[t]he department of transportation may place and maintain traffic control devices, conforming to its manual and specifications, upon all state highways as are necessary to indicate and to carry out sections 4511.”
Pierce v. Ohio Dep't of Transp., 491 N.E.2d 729 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 1985). · cites it 3ד” *127 R.C. 4511.10 states in pertinent part: “The department of transportation may place and maintain traffic control devices, conforming to its manual and specifications, upon all state highways as are necessary to indicate and to carry out sections 4511.”
White v. Ohio Dep't of Transp., 564 N.E.2d 462 (Ohio 1990). “I Duty to Cut Foliage on Morgan-Ross Road The Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (“MUTCD”) has been adopted as the state’s official specifications for highway signs and markings pursuant to the mandate of R.”
Toledo v. Blackshear, 2020-Ohio-1233. “{¶ 4} While his initial appeal was pending, Bey was charged with driving while under a license suspension in violation of R.C. 4511.10, a first-degree misdemeanor, and for driving with an expired registration in violation of R.”
Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. v. Ohio Dep't of Transp., 551 N.E.2d 215 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 1988). “Given the foregoing, for the purpose of the second assignment of error, we begin with the notion that the rough road sign shown in the videotape was in place prior to the accident.”
State v. Detienne, 2017-Ohio-9105. “Based on this amphetamine concentration, Detienne was cited for Operating a Vehicle While Under the Influence of a Controlled Substance in violation of R.C. 4511.10(A)(1)(j)(i), a misdemeanor of the first degree.”
O'Brien v. Dept. of Transp., 2019-Ohio-724. “{¶ 60} ODOT is statutorily mandated to adopt a manual and specifications for a uniform system of traffic control devices, and that uniform system "shall correlate with, and so far as possible conform to, the system approved by the federal highway administration.”
City of Maple Heights v. Smith, 722 N.E.2d 607 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 1999). “” R.C. 4511.10: “The department of transportation may place and maintain traffic control devices, conforming to its manual and specifications, upon all state highways as are necessary to indicate and to carry out sections 4511.”
State v. Detienne, 2017-Ohio-9105. “Based on this amphetamine concentration, Detienne was cited for Operating a Vehicle While Under the Influence of a Controlled Substance in violation of R.C. 4511.10(A)(1)(j)(i), a misdemeanor of the first degree.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.