Notes of Decisions
State v. Turner (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 6773 (Ohio 2020).
· cites it 8× “01(QQ) and the requirement in R.C. 4511.09 that the Ohio Department of Transportation (“ODOT”) adopt a manual for a uniform system of traffic-control devices.”
Bibler v. Stevenson (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 8449 (Ohio 2016).
· cites it 4× “11(A) provides: Local authorities in their respective jurisdictions shall place and maintain traffic control devices in accordance with the department of transportation manual of uniform system of traffic control devices, adopted under section 4511.09 of the Revised Code, upon…”
State v. Miller, 2015 Ohio 3529 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015).
· cites it 4× “{¶23} Further support that the General Assembly did not contemplate that stopping astride a clearly marked stop line would constitute compliance with R.”
City of Maple Heights v. Smith, 722 N.E.2d 607 (Ohio Ct. App. 1999).
· cites it 5× “” R.C. 4511.09 establishes that the Ohio Department of Transportation shall adopt a manual and specifications for a uniform system of traffic control devices.”
Matkovich v. Penn Cent. Transp. Co., 431 N.E.2d 652 (Ohio 1982).
· cites it 2× “33 provides, in part, that: “At all points where its railroad crosses a public road at a common grade, each company shall erect a sign in accordance with the department of transportation manual for uniform traffic control devices, adopted under section 4511.09 of the Revised…”
City of Bowling Green v. Godwin, 850 N.E.2d 698 (Ohio 2006).
“Appellant, the city of Bowling Green, and appellee stipulated that the six signs are officially recognized in the Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (“MUTCD”), adopted by the Ohio Department of Transportation pursuant to R.C. 4511.09. {¶ 5}…”
Rhodus v. Ohio Dep't of Transp., 588 N.E.2d 864 (Ohio Ct. App. 1990).
“Such uniform system shall correlate with, and so far as possible conform to, the system approved by the American Association of State Highway Officials.” Moreover, R.”
State v. Tyson, 2015 Ohio 3530 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015).
· cites it 4× “{¶23} Further support that the General Assembly did not contemplate that stopping astride a clearly marked stop line would constitute compliance with R.”
State, Ex Rel. Ohio Motorists Assn. v. Masten, 456 N.E.2d 567 (Ohio Ct. App. 1982).
· cites it 4× “” The Department of Transportation has adopted a Manual and Specifications for a Uniform System of Traffic Control Devices, pursuant to its statutory duty under R.C. 4511.09. 1 Section 6D-10(d) and (i) of this manual state: “(d) Except where the width of the intersecting street…”
Webb v. Edwards, 845 N.E.2d 530 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005).
· cites it 2× “R.C. 4511.09, uniform system of traffic control devices, provides that "[t]he department of transportation shall adopt a manual and specifications for a uniform system of traffic control devices, including signs denoting names of streets and highways, for use upon highways…”
Dietz v. Harshbarger, 2017 Ohio 2917 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 3× “2 The Ohio Department of Transportation adopted the Ohio Manual of Traffic Control Devices as required by R.C. 4511.09. See Bowling Green v. Godwin , 110 Ohio St.”
White v. Ohio Dep't of Transp., 564 N.E.2d 462 (Ohio 1990).
“I Duty to Cut Foliage on Morgan-Ross Road The Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (“MUTCD”) has been adopted as the state’s official specifications for highway signs and markings pursuant to the mandate of R.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4511.09(A)(1) — 1 case
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4511.09(A)(1)(a) — 1 case
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4511.09(A)(1)(d) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.