Okla. Stat. » Title 10 — CHILDREN
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 1103 (2026)

Renumbered as § 7003-3.1 of this title by Laws 1995, c

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

352, § 199, eff. July 1, 1995.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 35 cases, 1970–1994 · leading case: Davis v. Davis, 708 P.2d 1102 (Okla. 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Davis v. Davis, 708 P.2d 1102 (Okla. 1985). · cites it 6× “1(A) provide: "No pleading subsequent to the petition is required, and the filing of any motion or pleading shall not delay the holding of the adjudicatory hearing.”
J. v. v. State, 572 P.2d 1283 (Okla. 1977). · cites it 5× “Initially [10 O.S.Supp. 1976 § 1103] there is a determination by the court, on information of a citizen, whether a juvenile petition ought be filed.”
Ruth P. v. State, Dep't of Institutions, Soc. & Rehabilitative Servs., 578 P.2d 352 (Okla. 1978). · cites it 4× “not the juvenile petition referred to in 10 O.S.Supp. 1973 § 1103. Appellee petitioned for, and we granted, certiorari.”
J. T. P v. State, 544 P.2d 1270 (Okla. Crim. App. 1975). · cites it 4× “Juvenile Court proceedings are initiated by the filing of a verified petition with the Juvenile Division of the District Court in accordance with the provision of 10 O.S., § 1103. 7. The petition must be sufficient to give notice of the specific charge or factual allegation to…”
McDonald v. Wrigley, 870 P.2d 777 (Okla. 1994). “10 O.S.Supp.1993 § 1103(B). Or the grandparent may proceed directly on behalf of the child under 10 O.”
Calhoon v. State, 548 P.2d 1037 (Okla. Crim. App. 1976). “The State of Oklahoma instituted the proceedings against the juvenile by filing a verified petition in the Juvenile Division of the District Court in said case numbered JFJ-75-42 on October 1, 1975, as required by 10 O.S.Supp.1975, § 1103, alleging, among other things, as…”
Carl R. v. State, 882 P.2d 582 (Okla. Civ. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “On May 27, 1993, Appellee State of Oklahoma (State) filed a Petition, in accordance with 10 O.S.Supp.1992 § 1103, alleging Children were deprived as defined by 10 O.”
Matter of A.D.B., 818 P.2d 483 (Okla. 1991). · cites it 6× “Like its current counterpart, 10 O.S.Supp. 1990 § 1103, see note 9, supra, the statute in *488 effect when Matter of Daniel, 591 P.”
Nickell v. State, 562 P.2d 151 (Okla. Crim. App. 1977). · cites it 2× “In his first assignment of error defendant asserts several propositions dealing with alleged errors in the notice procedure used by the Juvenile Court, pursuant to 10 O.S.1971, §§ 1103, 1104 and 1105, and that therefore the Juvenile Court lacked jurisdiction and had no power to…”
JTP v. State, 544 P.2d 1270 (Okla. Crim. App. 1975). · cites it 4× “Juvenile Court proceedings are initiated by the filing of a verified petition with the Juvenile Division of the District Court in accordance with the provision of 10 O.S., § 1103. 7. The petition must be sufficient to give notice of the specific charge or factual allegation to…”
In re J. L. M., 598 P.2d 243 (Okla. Crim. App. 1979). · cites it 4× “A verified petition which listed witnesses and complied with all the requirements of 10 O.S.Supp.1978, § 1103, 1 was *245 filed on March 14, 1978, in Case No.”
Mook v. City of Tulsa, 565 P.2d 1065 (Okla. Crim. App. 1977). “1972, § 1102; 10 O.S.Supp. 1976, § 1103. Title 10 O.S.Supp.”
Show all 35 citing cases →
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 1103(B): 6 cases
Davis v. Davis, 708 P.2d 1102 (Okla. 1985). “1(A) provide: "No pleading subsequent to the petition is required, and the filing of any motion or pleading shall not delay the holding of the adjudicatory hearing.”
McDonald v. Wrigley, 870 P.2d 777 (Okla. 1994). “10 O.S.Supp.1993 § 1103(B). Or the grandparent may proceed directly on behalf of the child under 10 O.”
Matter of A.D.B., 818 P.2d 483 (Okla. 1991). “Like its current counterpart, 10 O.S.Supp. 1990 § 1103, see note 9, supra, the statute in *488 effect when Matter of Daniel, 591 P.”
M.L.R. v. State, 740 P.2d 1201 (Okla. Crim. App. 1987).
Matter of ADB, 818 P.2d 483 (Okla. 1991).
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 1103(a): 3 cases
Davis v. Davis, 708 P.2d 1102 (Okla. 1985). “1(A) provide: "No pleading subsequent to the petition is required, and the filing of any motion or pleading shall not delay the holding of the adjudicatory hearing.”
J. T. P v. State, 544 P.2d 1270 (Okla. Crim. App. 1975). “Juvenile Court proceedings are initiated by the filing of a verified petition with the Juvenile Division of the District Court in accordance with the provision of 10 O.S., § 1103. 7. The petition must be sufficient to give notice of the specific charge or factual allegation to…”
JTP v. State, 544 P.2d 1270 (Okla. Crim. App. 1975). “Juvenile Court proceedings are initiated by the filing of a verified petition with the Juvenile Division of the District Court in accordance with the provision of 10 O.S., § 1103. 7. The petition must be sufficient to give notice of the specific charge or factual allegation to…”
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 1103(b): 2 cases
Nickell v. State, 562 P.2d 151 (Okla. Crim. App. 1977). “In his first assignment of error defendant asserts several propositions dealing with alleged errors in the notice procedure used by the Juvenile Court, pursuant to 10 O.S.1971, §§ 1103, 1104 and 1105, and that therefore the Juvenile Court lacked jurisdiction and had no power to…”
Matter of D.S.H., 549 P.2d 826 (Okla. Crim. App. 1976).
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 1103(b)(1): 1 case
Coleman S. v. Dep't of Institutions, 581 P.2d 884 (Okla. 1978).
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 1103(c): 1 case
G.J.I. v. State, 778 P.2d 485 (Okla. Crim. App. 1989).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.