Okla. Stat. » Title 12 — CIVIL PROCEDURE
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 1879 (2026)

Appeal

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. An appeal may be taken from: 1. An order denying a motion to compel arbitration; 2. An order granting a motion to stay arbitration; 3. An order confirming or denying confirmation of an award; 4. An order modifying or correcting an award; 5. An order vacating an award without directing a rehearing; or 6. A final judgment entered pursuant to the Uniform Arbitration Act. B. An appeal under this section shall be taken as from an order or a judgment in a civil action. Added by Laws 2005, c. 364, § 29.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 2007–2023 · leading case: Williams v. Tamko Bldg. Prods. Inc, 2019 OK 61 (Okla. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Williams v. Tamko Bldg. Prods. Inc, 2019 OK 61 (Okla. 2019). · cites it 2× “§ 16(b)(1); 12 O.S. §1879; Green Tree Fin. Corp. -- Alabama v.”
Boler v. Sec. Health Care, L.L.C., 2014 OK 80 (Okla. 2014). · cites it 2× “3d 40 (Utah 2008), to hold that non-signatories to the arbitration agreement were not bound by it for their wrongful death claim because the claim was not wholly derivative of Cleo Boler's claim.”
Sutton v. David Stanley Chevrolet, 2020 OK 87 (Okla. 2020). “60 (i); 12 O.S. 2011, § 1879. The matter was assigned to the Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals, Div.”
East Texas Salt Water Disposal Co. v. Werline, 307 S.W.3d 267 (Tex. 2010). “3-28; Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 1879 ; Or.Rev. Stat.”
Bilbrey v. Cingular Wireless, L.L.C., 2007 OK 54 (Okla. 2007). · cites it 2× “1, 2006, and codified at 12 O.S.Supp.2006, § 1879(A)(1). [4] Kenneth W.”
Bark v. Lake Country Chevrolet Cadillac, LLC, 321 P.3d 1007 (Okla. Civ. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “Are made under the provisions of 12 O.S. § 1879"); 12 O.S. § 1879(A)(1) ("An appeal may be taken from: An order denying a motion to compel arbitration; .”
In Re: Amendment to Oklahoma Supreme Court Rule 1.60, 2019 OK 64 (Okla. 2019). “§ 993(A)(5)); (g) Certify or refuse to certify an action to be maintained as a class action (12 O.S. § 993(A)(6)); (h) Are enumerated in 58 O.”
Magel v. Nuveen, 2023 OK CIV APP 13 (Okla. Civ. App. 2023). “¶38 However, the remainder of the district court's order is reversed and this case is remanded with instructions to grant Doctors' motion to compel arbitration. ¶39 AFFIRMED, IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS TO COMPEL ARBITRATION .”
Magel v. Nuveen, 529 P.3d 928 (Okla. Civ. App. 2023). “¶38 However, the remainder of the district court's order is reversed and this case is remanded with instructions to grant Doctors' motion to compel arbitration. ¶39 AFFIRMED, IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS TO COMPEL ARBITRATION .”
In Re Amendment of Rule 1.60, Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules, 2023 OK 43 (Okla. 2023). · cites it 2× “§ 721 (interlocutory probate orders but not orders allowing a final account and granting a decree of distribution); (i) Are made under the provisions of 12 O.S. § 1879; or (j) Temporary orders of protection made in proceedings pursuant to the Protection From Domestic Abuse Act,…”
In Re: the Medeiros Revocable Trust, 2019 OK CIV APP 44 (Okla. Civ. App. 2019). · cites it 2× “60(i); 12 O.S. §1879(a)(1); Johnson v. Convalescent Center of Grady County , LLC, 2014 OK 102, ¶5, 341 P.”
In Re Amendment of Rule 1.60, Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules, 2023 OK 43 (Okla. 2023). · cites it 2× “§ 721 (interlocutory probate orders but not orders allowing a final account and granting a decree of distribution); (i) Are made under the provisions of 12 O.S. § 1879; or (j) Temporary orders of protection made in proceedings pursuant to the Protection From Domestic Abuse Act,…”
Show all 16 citing cases →
Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 1879(A)(1): 6 cases
Boler v. Sec. Health Care, L.L.C., 2014 OK 80 (Okla. 2014). “3d 40 (Utah 2008), to hold that non-signatories to the arbitration agreement were not bound by it for their wrongful death claim because the claim was not wholly derivative of Cleo Boler's claim.”
Bilbrey v. Cingular Wireless, L.L.C., 2007 OK 54 (Okla. 2007). “1, 2006, and codified at 12 O.S.Supp.2006, § 1879(A)(1). [4] Kenneth W.”
Bark v. Lake Country Chevrolet Cadillac, LLC, 321 P.3d 1007 (Okla. Civ. App. 2014). “Are made under the provisions of 12 O.S. § 1879"); 12 O.S. § 1879(A)(1) ("An appeal may be taken from: An order denying a motion to compel arbitration; .”
Magel v. Nuveen, 2023 OK CIV APP 13 (Okla. Civ. App. 2023).
Boler v. Sec. Health Care, L.L.C., 2014 OK 80 (Okla. 2014).
Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 1879(a)(1): 1 case
In Re: the Medeiros Revocable Trust, 2019 OK CIV APP 44 (Okla. Civ. App. 2019). “60(i); 12 O.S. §1879(a)(1); Johnson v. Convalescent Center of Grady County , LLC, 2014 OK 102, ¶5, 341 P.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.