Oklahoma Statutes
Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 1-101 (2026)
Short titles
✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
OK-LEGoklegislature.gov
JustiaOkla. Stat.
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Short Titles. (a) Sections 1-101 through 11-107 of this title shall be known and may be cited as the “Uniform Commercial Code”. (b) This article shall be known and may be cited as “Uniform Commercial Code - General Provisions”. Added by Laws 1961, p. 69, § 1-101. Amended by Laws 1988, c. 86, § 79, eff. Nov. 1, 1988; Laws 2005, c. 139, § 1, eff. Jan. 1, 2006.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 32
cases, 1964–2015 · leading case: Rogers v. Dell Comput. Corp., 2005 OK 51, 138 P.3d 826.
Rogers v. Dell Comput. Corp., 2005 OK 51, 138 P.3d 826. “Although Dell asserts Texas law applies, neither Dell nor the plaintiffs have maintained that there is any difference in the applicable law of Texas and Oklahoma.”
Rogers v. Dell Comput. Corp., 2005 OK 51, 127 P.3d 560. “Although Dell asserts Texas law applies, neither Dell nor the plaintiffs have maintained that there is any difference in the applicable law of Texas and Oklahoma.”
Holleyman v. Holleyman, 2003 OK 48, 78 P.3d 921. “[2] In arguing that even under pure contract law the lack of the assumed obligation's specificity would not preclude its enforcement, the concurring opinion cites § 2-204(3) of the Oklahoma Uniform Commercial Code, 12A O.S.2001 §§ 1-101 et seq. Section 2-204(3) applies only to…”
In re Magic Circle Energy Corp., 64 B.R. 269 (Bankr. W.D. Okla. 1986). “Inasmuch as a court is called upon to place itself in a commercial setting when interpretation of § 547(c)(2) arises, it is perforce logical to allude to commercial law and in particular the Uniform Commercial Code, adopted in Oklahoma at Okla.Stat. tit. 12A, § 1-101 et seq.…”
Shaw v. Union Bank & Trust Co., 640 P.2d 953 (Okla. 1981). “[7] 12A O.S. 1971 §§ 1-101 et seq. [8] The comment following 12A O.”
Collins Radio Co. of Dallas v. Bell, 623 P.2d 1039 (Okla. Civ. App. 1981). “725 (Vernon 1968); 12A O.S. 1971, §§ 1-101 to 2-725 (hereinafter cited by U.”
Carl E. Gungoll Expl. Jt. Venture v. Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma, 1998 OK 128, 975 P.2d 442. “[13] By executing the security agreement, the Tribe agreed that Oklahoma's Uniform Commercial Code, 12A O.S.1991, §§ 1-101 et seq., [14] would govern the bargain between the Tribe and Gungoll, even though it also reserved its sovereign rights.”
United Gen. Ins. Co. v. Crane Carrier Co., 695 P.2d 1334 (Okla. 1984). “2d 1030 (1976), 1 we held attorney fees are recoverable by the prevailing party in an action for breach of warranty under the Oklahoma Commercial Code (12A O.S. 1981, §§ 1-101, et seq.) by virtue of 12 O.”
Old Albany Estates, Ltd. v. Highland Carpet Mills, Inc., 604 P.2d 849 (Okla. 1979). “12A O.S.1971 § 1-101 et seq. hereinafter cited by section number alone.”
Aircraft Equip. Co. v. Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma, 1998 OK 126, 975 P.2d 450. “By executing the security agreement, the Tribe agreed that Oklahoma's Uniform Commercial Code, 12A O.S.1991, §§ 1-101 et seq., would govern the bargain between the Tribe and Aircraft Equipment, even though it also reserved its sovereign rights.”
Koch Fuels, Inc. v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n, 862 P.2d 471 (Okla. 1993). “Neither party relies on any provision of Oklahoma’s Uniform Commercial Code, 12A O.S. 1981 § 1-101 et seq. and our construction of the contracts should not be construed as implying the applicability or non-applicability of any particular provision of the Commercial Code.”
Thomas v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n (In Re Thomas), 469 B.R. 915 (B.A.P. 10th Cir. 2012). “§§ 4-1-101 to 4-11-102) and Oklahoma (Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 12A, §§ 1-101 to 11-107).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.