Okla. Stat. » Title 15 — CONTRACTS
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 15, § 751 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This act may be cited as the Oklahoma Consumer Protection Act. Laws 1972, c. 227, § 1, operative Sept. 1, 1972.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 50 cases (19 in the last 5 years), 1987–2026 · leading case: Rogers v. QuikTrip Corp., 2010 OK 3 (Okla. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rogers v. QuikTrip Corp., 2010 OK 3 (Okla. 2010). · cites it 5× “The plaintiffs contend that defendants’ failure to disclose the ethanol content of gasoline constitutes breach of contract, breach of express and implied warranties 2 and a violation of the Oklahoma Consumer Protection Act, 15 O.S. § 751 et seq. ¶ 3 The defendants moved to…”
Tibbetts v. Sight 'N Sound Appliance Centers, Inc., 2003 OK 72 (Okla. 2003). · cites it 3× “, d/b/a Sight `n Sound & Cost Warehouse under the Oklahoma Consumer Protection Act (OCPA), 15 O.S.1991, § 751 et seq., as amended. [1] We hold the trial judge erred, and the Court of Civil Appeals (COCA), Division I mistakenly affirmed, because the only reasonable attorney fee…”
Cates v. Integris Health, Inc., 2018 OK 9 (Okla. 2018). · cites it 2× “¶ 2 Cates brought state-law claims for breach of contract, deceit, and violation of the Oklahoma Consumer Protection Act, 15 O.S. §§ 751 et seq . But Integris argues that Cates's claims are expressly preempted by the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act 2 (ERISA).”
In re Pharm. Indus. Average Wholesale Price Litig., 252 F.R.D. 83 (D. Mass. 2008). · cites it 3× “), Oklahoma ( Okla. Stat. tit. 15, § 751 , et seq.), Rhode Island (R.”
Sheet Metal Workers Local 441 Health & Welfare Plan v. Glaxosmithkline, PLC, 737 F. Supp. 2d 380 (E.D. Pa. 2010). “Oklahoma Plaintiffs the IBEW Plan and UFCW claim GSK violated the Oklahoma Consumer Protection Statute (“OCPA”), codified at Okla. Stat. tit. 15, § 751 , et seq. SAC ¶ 216.”
Patterson v. Beall, 2000 OK 92 (Okla. 2000). “[or] more than is necessary to complete an undertaking." WEBSTER'S THIRD NEW INTERNATIONAL DICTIONARY at 2293 (1961).”
Holbert v. Echeverria, 744 P.2d 960 (Okla. 1987). “28 The lower court’s pretrial ruling on the consumer protection theory of the claim and its postjudgment denial of counsel-fee award are affirmed. DOOLIN, C.J., HARGRAVE, V.C.J., and LAVENDER, SIMMS, WILSON and SUMMERS, JJ.”
McDaneld v. Lynn Hickey Dodge, Inc., 1999 OK 30 (Okla. 1999). “15 O.S.1991 §§ 751 etseq. 3 . For its defense — that failure to file a counterclaim in the small-claim case bars the present action.”
Guffey v. Ostonakulov, 2014 OK 6 (Okla. 2014). · cites it 2× “Guffey alleged fraud and violations of the Oklahoma Consumer Protection Act, 15 O.S. §751 et seq. in connection with her purchase of a vehicle from Defendants using the auction site eBay.”
In Re Motor Fuel Temperature Sales Practices Litig., 534 F. Supp. 2d 1214 (D. Kan. 2008). “(Count XXX); the Oklahoma Consumer Protection Act, 15 Okla. Stat. tit. 15, § 751 et seq. (Count XXXI); Okla.”
Cont'l Resources v. Wolla Oilfield Servs., 2022 OK 40 (Okla. 2022). · cites it 2× “ntinental), an oil and gas producer headquartered in Oklahoma, and Wolla Oilfield Services, LLC (Wolla), a North Dakota limited liability company that operates as a hot oil ¶4 On March 4, 2020, Continental sued Wolla in the United States District Court for the Western District…”
Major v. Microsoft Corp., 2002 OK CIV APP 120 (Okla. Civ. App. 2002). “In his Third Claim for Relief, Major contends that Microsoft’s conduct and business practices constitute unfair and deceptive business practices as those terms are defined in the Oklahoma Consumer Protection Act (“CPA”), 15 O.”
Show all 50 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.