Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 598 - DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 598.0903 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 598.0903  Definitions.  As used in NRS 598.0903 to 598.0999, inclusive, unless the context otherwise requires, the words and terms defined in NRS 598.0905 to 598.0947, inclusive, have the meanings ascribed to them in those sections.

      (Added to NRS by 1973, 1482; A 1983, 881; 1985, 1480, 2256; 1989, 649; 1993, 1979; 1995, 2174; 1997, 158; 1999, 3334; 2001, 660; 2003, 587; 2005, 1227, 1249; 2007, 738; 2009, 1188; 2013, 1031; 2017, 1531, 4350; 2021, 1345, 1448)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 39 cases (20 in the last 5 years), 2004–2025 · leading case: In re Pharm. Indus. Average Wholesale Price Litig., 252 F.R.D. 83 (D. Mass. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Pharm. Indus. Average Wholesale Price Litig., 252 F.R.D. 83 (D. Mass. 2008). · cites it 4× “), Nevada (Nev. Rev.Stat. § 598.0903, et seq.), New Hampshire (N.”
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Dist. Ct., 2022 NV 55 (Nev. 2022). · cites it 4× “See NRS 598.0903. Thus, it is appropriate to use NRS 598.”
Abigail Bacon v. Avis Budget Grp. Inc, 959 F.3d 590 (3rd Cir. 2020). “, the Nevada Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Nev. Rev. Stat. § 598.0903 et seq., the Nevada Statutory Consumer Fraud Act, Nev.”
Ridenour v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharm., Inc., 679 F.3d 1062 (8th Cir. 2012). “, and the Nevada Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Nev.Rev.Stat. §§ 598.0903, et seq. BIP moved for summary judgment before Magistrate Judge Franklin L.”
Elson v. Black, 56 F.4th 1002 (5th Cir. 2023). “; Nevada Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Nev. Rev. Stat. § 598.0903 , et seq.; Arizona Consumer Fraud Act, Ariz.”
In re Suboxone (Buprenorphine Hydrochloride & Naloxone) Antitrust Litig., 64 F. Supp. 3d 665 (E.D. Pa. 2014). “Nevada Reckitt also argues that monopolization claims' are not actionable under Nevada’s consumer protection law, Nev.Rev.Stat. Ann. §§ 598.0903 et seq. However, that statute prohibits deceptive trade practices, which includes “[kjnowingly making a false representation as to the…”
Betsinger v. D.R. Horton, Inc., 232 P.3d 433 (Nev. 2010). “See NRS 598.0903-,0999. Thus, while some deceptive trade practices defined in NRS Chapter 598 sound in fraud, see, e.”
In Re Motor Fuel Temperature Sales Practices Litig., 534 F. Supp. 2d 1214 (D. Kan. 2008). “(Count XXVI); the Nevada Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Nev.Rev.Stat. § 598.0903 et seq. (Count XXVII); the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, N.”
In re Pharm. Indus. Average Wholesale Price Litig., 233 F.R.D. 229 (D. Mass. 2006). “; (t) Nev.Rev.Stat. § 598.0903, et seq.; (u) N.”
Berkson v. Gogo LLC, 147 F. Supp. 3d 123 (E.D.N.Y 2015). “600 and Nev. Rev. Stat. § 598.0903 et seq. (Nevada); N.”
Estakhrian v. Obenstine, 320 F.R.D. 63 (C.D. Cal. 2017). “21, 2008) (certifying class alleging Nevada statutory and common law unfair business practices claims); Nevada Deceptive Trade Practices Act, NRS §§ 598.0903, et seq. Even assuming Obenstine had established that there was a “true conflict” between Nevada and California law with…”
St. Mary's Reg'l Med. Ctr. v. Renown Health, 35 F. Supp. 3d 1275 (D. Nev. 2014). · cites it 2× “The Attorney General alleged that defendant Bank of America violated the Nevada Deceptive Trade Practices Act (“DTPA”), NRS §§ 598.0903 to 598.0999, by “misleading] Nevada consum *1283 ers about the terms and operation of its home mortgage modification and foreclosure processes.”
Show all 39 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.