Okla. Stat. » Title 20 — COURTS
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 20, § 1601 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Short Title. This act may be cited as the Revised Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act. Added by Laws 1973, c. 22, § 1, operative July 1, 1973. Amended by Laws 1997, c. 61, § 1, eff. Nov. 1, 1997.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 93 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1976–2026 · leading case: Odom v. Penske Truck Leasing Co., 2018 OK 23 (Okla. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Odom v. Penske Truck Leasing Co., 2018 OK 23 (Okla. 2018). · cites it 2× “, dissenting: ¶1 The United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit has presented this Court with a certified question of unsettled Oklahoma law, as provided in 20 O.S.2011, §§ 1601 - 1611. The 10TH Circuit has a pending appeal that involves a controversy over the exclusive…”
Hollaway v. UNUM Life Ins. Co. of Am., 2003 OK 90 (Okla. 2003). · cites it 4× “[7] ¶ 6 Recognizing that state law is determinative of the preemption issue on the bad *1026 faith cause of action and that this Court has not addressed the precise issue presented, the federal court certified the question to this Court pursuant to the Uniform Certification of…”
Am. Econ. Ins. Co. v. Bogdahn, 2004 OK 9 (Okla. 2004). · cites it 2× “[1] 20 O.S.2001 § 1601 et seq. [2] Reformulation of a certified question is authorized by 20 O.”
BP Am., Inc. v. State Auto Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 2005 OK 65 (Okla. 2005). · cites it 2× “¶ 1 The United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma certified two first impression questions of Oklahoma law to this Court under the Revised Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, 20 O.S.2001 §§ 1601, et seq. The federal court asks: “1.”
McClure v. ConocoPhillips Co., 2006 OK 42 (Okla. 2006). · cites it 2× “¶ 1 The United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma certified a single first impression question of Oklahoma law to this Court under the Revised Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, 20 O.S.2001 §§ 1601, et seq. As reformulated, 1 the question is:…”
Barrios v. Haskell Cnty. Pub. Facilities Auth., 432 P.3d 233 (Okla. 2018). “This Court has the power to answer these certified questions of law. Such power exists so long as the certified questions are presented in accordance with the provisions of the Revised Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, 20 O.”
Dayton Hudson Corp. v. Am. Mut. Liab. Ins. Co., 621 P.2d 1155 (Okla. 1980). · cites it 2× “The United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma certified the following questions pursuant to the Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, 20 O.S.Supp. 1979 § 1601 et seq.: 1. [Does] .”
Reynolds v. Advance Alarms, Inc., 2009 OK 97 (Okla. 2009). · cites it 2× “Pursuant to § 1604 of the Revised Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, 20 O.S.2001, §§ 1601 et seq., we reformulate the certified question within the confines of the federal district court's statement of relevant facts to read as follows: Does the Oklahoma Protection…”
Ply v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co., 2003 OK 97 (Okla. 2003). · cites it 3× “Accordingly, the federal district court, pursuant to the Revised Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, 20 O.S.Supp.1997, §§ 1601 et seq., [2] certified the following questions of state law to this Court: 1.”
Thiry v. Armstrong World Indus., 661 P.2d 515 (Okla. 1983). · cites it 2× “DOOLIN, Justice: The United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma has certified two questions of law to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma pursuant to the provisions of 20 O.S.Supp. 1980 § 1601 et seq. As certified those questions are: 1.”
Wood v. TXO Prod. Corp., 854 P.2d 880 (Okla. 1993). · cites it 2× “We are presented with a question certified to this court from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma, pursuant to the Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, 20 O.S.1981 §§ 1601 et seq., to wit: “Is an oil and gas lessee/operator who is…”
Burk v. K-Mart Corp., 770 P.2d 24 (Okla. 1989). “The United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma certified for this Court’s answer pursuant to the Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, 20 O.S.1981 §§ 1601 through 1612, six questions of law: 1.”
Show all 93 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.