Defining the vagueness of "significant romantic relationship"thin
Also stated as: Defining relationship intent and commitment
2 Oregon opinions cite these pages20231 page cited by Oregon courts
The pages courts cite for it
- Cited for: Defining the vagueness of "significant romantic relationship"
Ranked by how often Oregon courts cite each page. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.
Oregon opinions citing these pages
From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.
Nearest issues
- 19 opinions
Filed under: Family Law and Child Welfare Issues
Where else it is alive
Federal 89VA 67WA 55IL 22NY 15NJ 11TX 11IA 7NH 7UT 6MD 5CT 4MO 4VT 4AK 3MS 3ND 3WI 3ID 2ME 2AZ 1CO 1NC 1NE 1SC 1TN 1WV 1
Opinions per jurisdiction citing these pages. A span that stops early can mean the doctrine was dropped there.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law