Past actions indicating future expectations in relationships
Also stated as: Defining relationship intent and commitment
The pages courts cite for it
- Cited for: Past actions indicating future expectations in relationships
Ranked by how often Virginia courts cite each page. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.
Virginia opinions citing these pages
- Kenneth Davis v. City of Hampton Dep't of Soc. Servs., No. 0272171 (Va. Ct. App. Jan. 30, 2018)
- Janette Campbell v. Lynchburg Dep't of Soc. Servs., No. 1403163 (Va. Ct. App. Mar. 14, 2017)
- Janette Campbell v. Lynchburg Dep't of Soc. Servs., No. 1402163 (Va. Ct. App. Mar. 14, 2017)
- Janette Campbell v. Lynchburg Dep't of Soc. Servs., No. 1401163 (Va. Ct. App. Mar. 14, 2017)
- Janette Campbell v. Lynchburg Dep't of Soc. Servs., No. 0882163 (Va. Ct. App. Mar. 14, 2017)
- T.T.A.C v. Harrisonburg-Rockingham Soc. Servs. Dist., No. 1159163 (Va. Ct. App. Dec. 20, 2016)
- Loretta Roberts-Bond v. Harrisonburg-Rockingham Soc. Servs. Dist., No. 0770163 (Va. Ct. App. Dec. 20, 2016)
- Ivy Edwina Mooney v. Newport News Dep't of Human Servs., No. 0439161 (Va. Ct. App. Sept. 20, 2016)
- Ronald Redman, Jr. v. Roanoke City Dep't of Soc. Servs., No. 1900153 (Va. Ct. App. June 7, 2016)
- Ciara Malaine Grindle v. Virginia Beach Dep't of Human Servs., No. 1241151 (Va. Ct. App. Jan. 12, 2016)
- Michael Sean Eskridge v. Washington Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs., No. 1676143 (Va. Ct. App. Mar. 3, 2015)
- Clifton Lewis Flora, III v. Shenandoah Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs., No. 2217144 (Va. Ct. App. Mar. 3, 2015)
- Kiva Williams-Kemp v. Prince Edward Dep't of Soc. Servs., No. 1979142 (Va. Ct. App. Feb. 10, 2015)
- Jason Lafia v. Roanoke City Dep't of Soc. Servs., No. 1149143 (Va. Ct. App. Jan. 20, 2015)
- Carla Bridget Torres-Lara v. Accomack Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs., No. 0109141 (Va. Ct. App. Dec. 16, 2014)
From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.
Nearest issues
- 13 opinions
- 86 opinions
- 97 opinions
- 8 opinions
- 9 opinions
Filed under: Parental; Child; Custody
Where else it is alive
Opinions per jurisdiction citing these pages. A span that stops early can mean the doctrine was dropped there.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law