Defining meretricious relationship factors and duration
Also stated as: Defining relationship intent and commitment
The pages courts cite for it
- Cited for: Defining meretricious relationship factors and duration
- Cited for: Defining the vagueness of "significant romantic relationship"
- Cited for: Describing the factual background of the relationship
- Cited for: Distinguishing mother-fetus relationship from other duties
- Cited for: Recognizing marriage as an intimate relationship
Ranked by how often Washington courts cite each page. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.
Washington opinions citing these pages
- Pers. Restraint Petition Of Sean Anthony Thompson, No. 83298-1 (Wash. Ct. App. Dec. 4, 2023)
- State Of Washington v. Syr Rumsey, No. 80920-2 (Wash. Ct. App. Apr. 19, 2021)
- State Of Washington v. Heath Landon McMillian, No. 53247-6 (Wash. Ct. App. Feb. 12, 2021)
- State Of Washington v. Eli Mansour, 470 P.3d 543 (Wash. Ct. App. 2020)
- State of Washington v. Daniel Joseph West, No. 36008-3 (Wash. Ct. App. Oct. 17, 2019)
- State Of Washington v. Quinn Robinett, No. 50653-0 (Wash. Ct. App. Jan. 15, 2019)
- State Of Washington v. Heber S. Green, No. 50396-4 (Wash. Ct. App. Nov. 14, 2018)
- State Of Washington v. George M. Chapa, No. 50924-5 (Wash. Ct. App. Nov. 14, 2018)
- State Of Washington v. Brian T. Stark, No. 76676-7 (Wash. Ct. App. Oct. 15, 2018)
- State v. Hai Minh Nguyen, 425 P.3d 847 (Wash. 2018)
- State Of Washington v. Pablo Santos-santiago, No. 74421-6 (Wash. Ct. App. Nov. 20, 2017)
- State Of Washington v. Dominique Debra Norris, 404 P.3d 83 (Wash. Ct. App. 2017)
- State Of Washington v. Martin Amaya-ontiveros, No. 74356-2 (Wash. Ct. App. July 31, 2017)
- State Of Washington v. Andrew Jason Trotman, No. 74549-2 (Wash. Ct. App. Apr. 24, 2017)
- State of Washington v. Gregory E. Dickerson, No. 32899-6 (Wash. Ct. App. May 26, 2016)
From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.
Nearest issues
Filed under: Parental; Child; Custody
Where else it is alive
Opinions per jurisdiction citing these pages. A span that stops early can mean the doctrine was dropped there.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law