Or. Rev. Stat. § 161.005

Short title

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      161.005 Short title. ORS 161.005 to 161.055, 161.065, 161.085 to 161.125, 161.150 to 161.175, 161.190 to 161.275, 161.290 to 161.373, 161.405 to 161.485, 161.505 to 161.585, 161.605, 161.615 to 161.685, 161.705 to 161.737, 162.005, 162.015 to 162.035, 162.055 to 162.115, 162.135 to 162.205, 162.225 to 162.375, 162.405 to 162.425, 162.465, 163.005, 163.095, 163.107, 163.115, 163.125 to 163.145, 163.149, 163.160 to 163.208, 163.191, 163.196, 163.215 to 163.257, 163.261, 163.263, 163.264, 163.266, 163.275, 163.285, 163.305 to 163.467, 163.429, 163.432, 163.433, 163.472, 163.505 to 163.575, 163.665 to 163.693, 163.700, 163.701, 163.715, 163.720, 164.005, 164.015 to 164.135, 164.138, 164.140, 164.205 to 164.270, 164.305 to 164.377, 164.395 to 164.415, 164.805, 164.857, 164.886, 165.002 to 165.102, 165.109, 165.118, 165.805, 165.815, 166.005 to 166.095, 166.119, 166.125, 166.128, 166.350, 166.382, 166.384, 166.660, 167.002 to 167.027, 167.057, 167.060 to 167.100, 167.117, 167.122 to 167.162, 167.203 to 167.252, 167.310 to 167.340, 167.350, 167.810 and 167.820 shall be known and may be cited as Oregon Criminal Code of 1971. [1971 c.743 §1; 1979 c.476 §1; 1983 c.740 §25; 1983 c.792 §1; 1985 c.366 §2; 1985 c.557 §9; 1985 c.662 §10; 1985 c.755 §1; 1989 c.982 §3; 1989 c.1003 §5; 2003 c.383 §3; 2007 c.475 §4; 2007 c.684 §2; 2007 c.811 §6; 2007 c.867 §16; 2007 c.869 §5; 2007 c.876 §5; 2009 c.783 §6; 2009 c.811 §15; 2011 c.681 §5; 2015 c.321 §2; 2015 c.379 §2; 2015 c.645 §9; 2016 c.22 §4; 2017 c.649 §2; 2019 c.635 §15; 2021 c.276 §2; 2023 c.200 §3; 2023 c.205 §2; 2023 c.228 §50; 2023 c.608 §4; 2025 c.417 §2]

 

      161.010 [Repealed by 1971 c.743 §432]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 32 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1976–2026 · leading case: State v. Turnidge
State v. Turnidge (2016) or · cites it 3× “83 In past cases, we have determined whether a statute is within or outside the Oregon Criminal Code based on whether it was enacted as part of the revised Oregon Criminal Code of 1971 or is listed in ORS 161.005, which enumerates the statutes that may be cited as part of the…”
State v. Owen (2022) or “See ORS 161.005 (defining statutory provisions included in the code).”
State v. Ruggles (2010) orctapp · cites it 4× “At the same time, the legislature enacted ORS 161.005, which lists the statutes that “shall be known and may be cited as Oregon Criminal Code of 1971.”
State v. Simonov (2016) or “1 ORS 161.005 spells out precisely which, provisions of the Oregon Revised Statutes may be cited as the “Oregon Criminal Code of 1971,” commonly referred to as the “Oregon Criminal Code” without the date.”
State v. Hubbell (2021) orctapp “The provisions of the Oregon Criminal Code of 1971, ORS 161.005 to ORS 167.820, are therefore applicable.”
State v. Rainoldi (2010) orctapp · cites it 2× “” 2 ORS 161.005 lists statutes that “shall be known and may be cited as Oregon Criminal Code of 1971.”
State v. Wier (2013) orctapp · cites it 2× “427, which is part of the Oregon Criminal Code of 1971, ORS 161.005, does not explicitly prescribe a culpable mental state for first-degree sexual abuse.”
State v. Rainoldi (2011) or “ORS 161.005 spells out precisely which provisions of the Oregon Revised Statutes may be cited as the “Oregon Criminal Code of 1971,” commonly referred to as the “Oregon Criminal Code” without the date.”
State v. Gensitskiy (2019) or “105(1)(b) ; see also ORS 161.005 (enumerating the statutes that may be cited as part of the criminal code).”
State v. Rutley (2007) or “* * *” 6 See ORS 161.005 (listing sections that comprise the Oregon Criminal Code).”
State v. Rutley (2005) orctapp “” ORS 161.005. It does not, however, contain any explicit culpable mental state requirement.”
State v. Efimoff (2026) orctapp · cites it 3× “Statutes “enacted as part of the revised Oregon Criminal Code of 1971” or that are “listed in ORS 161.005” are generally understood to be within the Criminal Code.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.