Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 197.644 (2026)

Modification of work program; exclusive jurisdiction of Land Conservation and Development Commission

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

197.644 Modification of work program; exclusive jurisdiction of Land Conservation and Development Commission. (1) The Director of the Department of Land Conservation and Development may authorize or direct a local government to modify an approved work program when:

(a) Issues of regional or statewide significance arising out of another local government’s periodic review require an enhanced level of coordination;

(b) Issues of goal compliance are raised as a result of completion of a work task resulting in a need to undertake further review or revisions;

(c) Issues relating to the organization of the work program, coordination with affected agencies or persons, or orderly implementation of work tasks, result in a need for further review or revision; or

(d) Issues relating to needed housing, employment, transportation or public facilities and services were omitted from the work program but must be addressed in order to ensure compliance with the statewide planning goals.

(2) The Land Conservation and Development Commission shall have exclusive jurisdiction for review of the completed work tasks as set forth in ORS 197.628 to 197.651.

(3) Commission action pursuant to subsection (2) of this section is a final order subject to judicial review in the manner provided in ORS 197.650 and 197.651. [1991 c.612 §6; 1997 c.634 §1; 1999 c.622 §5; 2011 c.469 §3]

197.645 [1983 c.827 §11d; 1987 c.729 §10; repealed by 1991 c.612 §23]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1998–2005 · leading case: City of West Linn v. Land Conservation & Dev. Comm'n, 119 P.3d 285 (Or. Ct. App. 2005).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

City of West Linn v. Land Conservation & Dev. Comm'n, 119 P.3d 285 (Or. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 3× “ORS 197.644(2). LCDC’s decision is subject to judicial review “in the manner provided in ORS 197.”

Hummel v. Land Conservation & Dev. Comm'n, 954 P.2d 824 (Or. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 3× “ORS 197.644(2). Action pursuant to that authority is a final order subject to our review under ORS 197.”

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 197.644(2) — 2 cases

City of West Linn v. Land Conservation & Dev. Comm'n, 119 P.3d 285 (Or. Ct. App. 2005). “ORS 197.644(2). LCDC’s decision is subject to judicial review “in the manner provided in ORS 197.”

Hummel v. Land Conservation & Dev. Comm'n, 954 P.2d 824 (Or. Ct. App. 1998). “ORS 197.644(2). Action pursuant to that authority is a final order subject to our review under ORS 197.”

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 197.644(3)(a) — 1 case

City of West Linn v. Land Conservation & Dev. Comm'n, 119 P.3d 285 (Or. Ct. App. 2005). “ORS 197.644(2). LCDC’s decision is subject to judicial review “in the manner provided in ORS 197.”

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 197.644(4)(a) — 1 case

Hummel v. Land Conservation & Dev. Comm'n, 954 P.2d 824 (Or. Ct. App. 1998). “ORS 197.644(2). Action pursuant to that authority is a final order subject to our review under ORS 197.”

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 197.644(l)(b) — 1 case

Hummel v. Land Conservation & Dev. Comm'n, 954 P.2d 824 (Or. Ct. App. 1998). “ORS 197.644(2). Action pursuant to that authority is a final order subject to our review under ORS 197.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.