Oregon Revised Statutes
Or. Rev. Stat. § 215.190 (2026)
Violation of ordinances or regulations
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
ORSoregonlegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
215.190 Violation of ordinances or regulations. No person shall locate, construct, maintain, repair, alter, or use a building or other structure or use or transfer land in violation of an ordinance or regulation authorized by ORS 215.010 to 215.190 and 215.402 to 215.438. [1955 c.439 §9; 1963 c.619 §13]
215.200 [1957 s.s. c.11 §1; renumbered 215.285]
AGRICULTURAL LAND USE
(Exclusive Farm Use Zones)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1972–2024 · leading case: Cyrus v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners of Deschutes, 202 P.3d 274 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).
Cyrus v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners of Deschutes, 202 P.3d 274 (Or. Ct. App. 2009). “Within counties, ORS 215.190 makes it unlawful to use land or construct a structure in violation of a county zoning law.”
Twin Rocks Watseco Def. Comm. v. Sheets, 516 P.2d 472 (Or. Ct. App. 1973). “" ORS 215.190. The general rule is stated in ORS 215.”
Parks v. Bd. of Cty. Com'rs of Tillamook Cty., 501 P.2d 85 (Or. Ct. App. 1972). “) “No person shall * * * construct * * * a building * * * in violation of [a county zoning] ordinance * * ORS 215.190. Statutes are construed to give meaning and effect to all of the terms used therein.”
Stacey v. Myers, 154 P.3d 109 (Or. 2007). “See ORS 215.190 (prohibiting construction in violation of certain land use statutes); ORS 215.”
Umatilla Cnty. v. Dept. of Energy (Or. 2024). “283(2)(g) and ORS 215.190, as context for its interpretation of ORS 469.”
Umatilla Cnty. v. Dept. of Energy (Or. 2024). “283(2)(g) and ORS 215.190, as context for its interpretation of ORS 469.”
Bishop v. KC Dev. Grp., LLC, 300 Or. App. 584 (Or. Ct. App. 2019). “” 4 ORS 215.190 provides: “No person shall locate, construct, maintain, repair, alter, or use a building or other structure or use or transfer land in violation of an ordinance or regulation authorized by ORS 215.”
Drain v. Clackamas Cnty., 585 P.2d 746 (Or. Ct. App. 1978). “They were among those who initiated the rezoning and knew that the rezoning had been approved by the county commissioners before the final subdivision approval.”
Stacey v. Myers (Or. 2007). “See ORS 215.190 (prohibiting construction in violation of certain land use statutes); ORS 215.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.