260.083
Contents of statements.
(1)(a) For a contribution, except as provided in ORS 260.085, a statement filed
under ORS 260.044, 260.057, 260.076, 260.078 or 260.118 shall list:
(A) The name,
occupation and address of each person, and the name and address of each
political committee or petition committee, that contributed an aggregate amount
of more than $100 in a calendar year on behalf of a candidate or to a political
committee or petition committee and the total amount contributed by that person
or committee; and
(B) The total
amount of other contributions as a single item, but shall specify how those
contributions were obtained.
(b) For an
expenditure, including an independent expenditure, a statement filed under ORS
260.044, 260.057, 260.076, 260.078 or 260.118 shall list:
(A) The amount
and purpose of each expenditure made in an aggregate amount of more than $100
to a payee, the name or, if applicable, the business name of the payee of the
expenditure, and the city, or county if the payee is not located in a city, and
state in which the payee is located; and
(B) The total
amount of other expenditures as a single item.
(c) For each
loan, whether repaid or not, made by or to a candidate, political committee or
petition committee, a statement filed under ORS 260.044, 260.057, 260.076,
260.078 or 260.118 shall list:
(A) The name and
address of each person shown as a cosigner or guarantor on a loan and the
amount of the obligation undertaken by each cosigner or guarantor;
(B) The name of
the lender holding the loan; and
(C) The terms of
the loan, including the interest rate and repayment schedule.
(2) An
expenditure shall be reported as an account payable only if the expenditure is
not paid within the time specified in ORS 260.057, 260.076 or 260.118.
(3) Anything of
value paid for or contributed by any person shall be listed as both an in-kind
contribution and an expenditure by the candidate or committee for whose benefit
the payment or contribution was made.
(4) If a
candidate, political committee or petition committee under ORS 260.057 or
260.118 makes an expenditure that must be reported as an in-kind contribution
and an expenditure as provided in subsection (3) of this section, the
candidate, political committee or petition committee making the original
expenditure shall, in any statement filed under ORS 260.057, 260.078 or
260.118, identify the expenditure as an in-kind contribution and identify the
candidate, political committee or petition committee for whose benefit the
expenditure was made.
(5) If a
political committee makes an expenditure that qualifies as an independent
expenditure under ORS 260.005 (10), the listing of the expenditure under this
section shall identify any candidates or measures that are the subject of the
independent expenditure and state whether the independent expenditure was used
to advocate the election, passage or defeat of the candidates or measures.
(6) As used in
this section:
(a) “Address” has
the meaning given that term in rules adopted by the Secretary of State.
(b) “Contribution”
and “expenditure” include a contribution or expenditure to or on behalf of an
initiative, referendum or recall petition. [Formerly 260.162; 1981 c.234 §11;
1985 c.732 §5; 1989 c.80 §4; 1989 c.503 §42; 1989 c.1054 §12; 1991 c.258 §1;
1991 c.719 §15; 1993 c.493 §68; 1995 c.1 §20; 1995 c.607 §87; 1999 c.262 §3;
1999 c.814 §1; 1999 c.999 §10; 2001 c.82 §5; 2001 c.965 §59; 2003 c.542 §14;
2005 c.797 §13; 2005 c.809 §§8,16; 2009 c.818 §10; 2013 c.756 §3]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
11
cases, 1991–2014 · leading case:
State v. Moyer, 230 P.3d 7 (Or. 2010).
State v. Moyer, 230 P.3d 7 (Or. 2010).
· cites it 8× “076; ORS 260.083. Any contribution from a person or campaign committee that “contributed an aggregate amount of more than $50” must be listed in the statement individually, along with the contributor’s name, address, and occupation.”
State v. Moyer, 200 P.3d 619 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).
· cites it 8× “ORS 260.083(1)(a). "The statement may list as a single item the total amount of other contributions, but shall specify how those contributions were obtained.”
Gordon Just., Jr. v. Delbert Hosemann, et, 771 F.3d 285 (5th Cir. 2014).
“Or.Rev. Stat. Ann. § 260.083(l)(a). Montana sets its itemization level at $35, and its form asks for the donor’s name, address, occupation, and employer.”
Oregon Taxpayers United PAC v. Keisling, 924 P.2d 853 (Or. Ct. App. 1996).
“ORS 260.083. ORS 260.073 requires the same information from political committees concerning contributions and expenditures in general elections.”
Friends of Bill Bradbury v. Dep't of Just., 182 P.3d 303 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).
· cites it 12× “ORS 260.083 (2003), amended by Or Laws 2005, chapter 809, section 8, details the content of the statements of contributions and expenditures.”
Gold v. Roberts, 809 P.2d 1334 (Or. Ct. App. 1991).
“The order imposed penalties totalling $28,555 against petitioner personally for violations of ORS 260.083. We affirm. The Secretary found: “1.”
BERNARD FOR COM'R v. Elections Div., 211 P.3d 321 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).
“ORS 260.083(1)(a). `The statement may list as a single item the total amount of other contributions, but shall specify how those contributions were obtained.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 260.083(1) — 1 case
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 260.083(1)(a) — 2 cases
State v. Moyer, 200 P.3d 619 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).
“ORS 260.083(1)(a). "The statement may list as a single item the total amount of other contributions, but shall specify how those contributions were obtained.”
BERNARD FOR COM'R v. Elections Div., 211 P.3d 321 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).
“ORS 260.083(1)(a). `The statement may list as a single item the total amount of other contributions, but shall specify how those contributions were obtained.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 260.083(1)(a)(A) — 1 case
State v. Moyer, 200 P.3d 619 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).
“ORS 260.083(1)(a). "The statement may list as a single item the total amount of other contributions, but shall specify how those contributions were obtained.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 260.083(5) — 1 case
Friends of Bill Bradbury v. Dep't of Just., 182 P.3d 303 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).
“ORS 260.083 (2003), amended by Or Laws 2005, chapter 809, section 8, details the content of the statements of contributions and expenditures.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 260.083(8) — 1 case
Friends of Bill Bradbury v. Dep't of Just., 182 P.3d 303 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).
“ORS 260.083 (2003), amended by Or Laws 2005, chapter 809, section 8, details the content of the statements of contributions and expenditures.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 260.083(8)(a) — 1 case
Friends of Bill Bradbury v. Dep't of Just., 182 P.3d 303 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).
“ORS 260.083 (2003), amended by Or Laws 2005, chapter 809, section 8, details the content of the statements of contributions and expenditures.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 260.083(l)(a) — 5 cases
Gordon Just., Jr. v. Delbert Hosemann, et, 771 F.3d 285 (5th Cir. 2014).
“Or.Rev. Stat. Ann. § 260.083(l)(a). Montana sets its itemization level at $35, and its form asks for the donor’s name, address, occupation, and employer.”
State v. Moyer, 230 P.3d 7 (Or. 2010).
“076; ORS 260.083. Any contribution from a person or campaign committee that “contributed an aggregate amount of more than $50” must be listed in the statement individually, along with the contributor’s name, address, and occupation.”
State v. Moyer, 200 P.3d 619 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).
“ORS 260.083(1)(a). "The statement may list as a single item the total amount of other contributions, but shall specify how those contributions were obtained.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 260.083(l)(a)(A) — 1 case
State v. Moyer, 200 P.3d 619 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).
“ORS 260.083(1)(a). "The statement may list as a single item the total amount of other contributions, but shall specify how those contributions were obtained.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 260.083(l)(b) — 1 case
Friends of Bill Bradbury v. Dep't of Just., 182 P.3d 303 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).
“ORS 260.083 (2003), amended by Or Laws 2005, chapter 809, section 8, details the content of the statements of contributions and expenditures.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.