475.930
Imposition of sentence under ORS 164.061, 475.907, 475.924 and 475.925. (1) When a court sentences a
person under ORS 164.061, 475.907, 475.924 and 475.925:
(a) The court
shall use the criminal history scale of the sentencing guidelines grid of the
Oregon Criminal Justice Commission to determine the sentence to impose. The
sentence described in:
(A) ORS 475.925
(1) shall be determined utilizing crime category 10 of the sentencing
guidelines grid.
(B) ORS 475.907
(1) and 475.925 (2) shall be determined utilizing crime category 9 of the
sentencing guidelines grid.
(C) ORS 164.061
shall be determined utilizing crime category 8 of the sentencing guidelines
grid.
(b)(A)
Notwithstanding ORS 161.605, the court shall impose the sentence described in
ORS 164.061, 475.907, 475.924 and 475.925 and may not impose a sentence of
optional probation or grant a downward dispositional departure or a downward
durational departure under the rules of the commission.
(B) The court may
impose a sentence other than the sentence described in ORS 164.061, 475.907,
475.924 and 475.925 if the court imposes a longer term of incarceration that is
otherwise required or authorized by law.
(2) A person
sentenced under ORS 164.061, 475.907, 475.924 and 475.925 may not receive a
reduction in the term of incarceration for appropriate institutional behavior
that exceeds 20 percent of the sentence imposed. [2008 c.14 §11]
Note: 475.930 was enacted into law but
was not added to or made a part of ORS chapter 475 or any series therein by
law. See Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes for further explanation.
475.933 [2009 c.660 §10; repealed by 2013
c.649 §9]
475.934 [2013 c.649 §11; 2017 c.21 §31;
2025 c.532 §11; repealed by 2025 c.557 §37]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
7
cases (
6 in the last 5 years), 2018–2025 · leading case:
State v. Miller, 422 P.3d 327 (Or. Ct. App. 2018).
State v. Miller, 422 P.3d 327 (Or. Ct. App. 2018).
· cites it 9× “" Consequently, the court proceeded to sentence defendant according to the statutorily required minimum sentences, as applicable.”
State v. Gardner-Rolph, 345 Or. App. 681 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
· cites it 4× “925 and ORS 475.930.” 291 Or App at 604 . As applicable to the defendant, ORS 475.”
State v. Bedford, 344 Or. App. 92 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
· cites it 2× “925(2)(c); ORS 475.930(1)(a)(B). On defendant’s conviction for delivery of methamphet- amine, the court ranked defendant at crime category 8.”
State v. Bedford, 344 Or. App. 92 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
· cites it 2× “925(2)(c); ORS 475.930(1)(a) (B). On defendant’s conviction for delivery of methamphet- amine, the court ranked defendant at crime category 8.”
State v. Gardner-Rolph, 345 Or. App. 681 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
· cites it 4× “925 and ORS 475.930.” 291 Or App at 604 . As applicable to the defendant, ORS 475.”
State v. Lander, 344 Or. App. 600 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“925 and ORS 475.930. As a result, related crimes are subject to similar penalties, depending on the quantities of different drugs the legislature has deemed comparable and the defendant’s criminal history.”
State v. Lander, 344 Or. App. 600 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“925 and ORS 475.930. As a result, related crimes are subject to similar penalties, depending on the quantities of different drugs the legislature has deemed comparable and the defendant’s criminal history.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 475.930(1) — 1 case
State v. Miller, 422 P.3d 327 (Or. Ct. App. 2018).
“" Consequently, the court proceeded to sentence defendant according to the statutorily required minimum sentences, as applicable.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 475.930(1)(a) — 1 case
State v. Bedford, 344 Or. App. 92 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“925(2)(c); ORS 475.930(1)(a) (B). On defendant’s conviction for delivery of methamphet- amine, the court ranked defendant at crime category 8.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 475.930(1)(a)(A) — 1 case
State v. Miller, 422 P.3d 327 (Or. Ct. App. 2018).
“" Consequently, the court proceeded to sentence defendant according to the statutorily required minimum sentences, as applicable.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 475.930(1)(a)(B) — 2 cases
State v. Bedford, 344 Or. App. 92 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“925(2)(c); ORS 475.930(1)(a)(B). On defendant’s conviction for delivery of methamphet- amine, the court ranked defendant at crime category 8.”
State v. Bedford, 344 Or. App. 92 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“925(2)(c); ORS 475.930(1)(a) (B). On defendant’s conviction for delivery of methamphet- amine, the court ranked defendant at crime category 8.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 475.930(1)(b)(A) — 1 case
State v. Miller, 422 P.3d 327 (Or. Ct. App. 2018).
“" Consequently, the court proceeded to sentence defendant according to the statutorily required minimum sentences, as applicable.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.