Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes
68 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3108 (2026)
Supplemental general principles of law.
✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
PA-LEGpalegis.us
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 3108. Supplemental general principles of law.
The principles of law and equity, including the law of corporations and unincorporated associations, the law of real property and the law relative to capacity to contract, principal and agent, eminent domain, estoppel, fraud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake, receivership, substantial performance or other validating or invalidating cause supplement the provisions of this subpart except to the extent inconsistent with this subpart.
Cross References. Section 3108 is referred to in section 3102 of this title.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1993–2020 · leading case: Metroclub Condo. Ass'n v. 201-59 North Eighth Street Assocs., 47 A.3d 137 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2012).
Metroclub Condo. Ass'n v. 201-59 North Eighth Street Assocs., 47 A.3d 137 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2012). “68 Pa.C.S. § 3108. Accordingly, although Association fails to persuade us the Declaration is a contract, like other courts, where appropriate, we may apply principles related to contract law when examining the Declaration.”
Country Classics at Morgan Hill Homeowners' Ass'n v. Country Classics at Morgan Hill, LLC, 780 F. Supp. 2d 367 (E.D. Pa. 2011). “Unconscionability of Declaration In essence, the Association asserts that the Declaration is an unconscionable adhesion contract because the unit owners were forced to bear sole responsibility for maintenance of the retaining walls and had no choice but to abide by the terms of…”
Riverwatch Condo. Owners Ass'n v. Restoration Dev. Corp., 980 A.2d 674 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2009). “More specifically, the Association contends that the Declarant’s representations can be used to support an estoppel defense in the instant action pursuant to Section 3108 of the PUCA, 68 Pa.C.S. § 3108. However, in the absence of any assertion that Restoration was aware of the…”
Lyman v. Boonin, 635 A.2d 1029 (Pa. 1993). “68 Pa.C.S. § 3108. Every contract or duty governed by this subpart imposes an obligation of good faith in its performance or enforcement.”
Hillside Villas Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Bottaro Dev. Co., 177 A.3d 456 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2018). “See 68 Pa. C.S. § 3108. Upon analysis, however, we conclude that -this case is distinguishable from those on which the Trust relies.”
J. Dana v. Lofts at 1234 Condo. Assoc. (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2020). “See 68 Pa. C.S. § 3108 (stating that “[t]he principles of law and equity, including the law of corporations and unincorporated associations .”
R.P. Cooley v. Lofts at 1234 Condo. Assoc. (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2020). “See 68 Pa. C.S. § 3108 (stating that “[t]he principles of law and equity, including the law of corporations and unincorporated associations .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.