Analyzing trial error and harmless-error rule application
Also stated as: Harmless error after step two evaluation sequence
The pages courts cite for it
- Cited for: Analyzing trial error and harmless-error rule application
- Cited for: Analyzing trial error and harmless error analysis
- Cited for: Analyzing harmless error in trial process integrity
- Cited for: Determining harmless error for improper test administration
- Cited for: Applying harmless-error standard to trial errors
- Cited for: Determining harmless error for trial exclusion
Ranked by how often Texas courts cite each page. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.
Texas opinions citing these pages
- Andres Enrique Bonilla v. State of Texas, No. 14-22-00428-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Apr. 18, 2024)
- Walter Henry Paterson v. State of Texas, No. 09-21-00394-CR (Tex. App.—Beaumont Jan. 17, 2024)
- Noel Young Anderson v. State, No. 05-19-00959-CR (Tex. App.—Dallas Dec. 21, 2020)
- Gabino Hernandez-Dominguez v. State, No. 03-19-00125-CR (Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 31, 2020)
- Luis Pedregon v. State, No. 08-18-00119-CR (Tex. App.—El Paso Mar. 10, 2020)
- Christopher Shane Artz v. State, No. 14-17-00973-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Apr. 2, 2019)
- Smith v. State, 522 S.W.3d 628 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2017)
- Standley Delano Davis v. State, No. 10-16-00011-CR (Tex. App.—Waco Dec. 14, 2016)
- Denise Wilnell Dirden v. State, No. 09-14-00330-CR (Tex. App.—Beaumont Aug. 24, 2016)
- Elizondo, Jose Guadalupe Rodriguez, 487 S.W.3d 185 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016)
- Christopher Wiley v. State, No. 12-14-00126-CR (Tex. App.—Tyler June 18, 2015)
- Johnathan Renard Castaneda v. State, No. 01-14-00389-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Jan. 28, 2015)
- Reeves, Gary Patrick, 420 S.W.3d 812 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013)
- Reeves, Gary Patrick, No. PD-1711-12 (Tex. Crim. App. Sept. 18, 2013)
- Wooten, Codiem Renoir, 400 S.W.3d 601 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013)
From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.
Nearest issues
- 180 opinions
- 224 opinions
- 12 opinions
- 220 opinions
- 450 opinions
- 9 opinions
- 17 opinions
- 89 opinions
Filed under: Harmless and Plain Error Analysis
Where else it is alive
Opinions per jurisdiction citing these pages. A span that stops early can mean the doctrine was dropped there.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law