Tex. Codes » Family Code · TITLE 5. THE PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP AND THE SUIT AFFECTING THE PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP · SUBTITLE A. GENERAL PROVISIONS · CHAPTER 103. VENUE AND TRANSFER OF ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS
Texas Codes

Tex. Fam. Code § 103.001 (2026)

Venue For Original Suit

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 103.001. VENUE FOR ORIGINAL SUIT. (a) Except as otherwise provided by this title, an original suit shall be filed in the county where the child resides, unless:

(1) another court has continuing exclusive jurisdiction under Chapter 155; or

(2) venue is fixed in a suit for dissolution of a marriage under Subchapter D, Chapter 6.

(b) A suit in which adoption is requested may be filed in the county where the child resides or in the county where the petitioners reside, regardless of whether another court has continuing exclusive jurisdiction under Chapter 155. Except as provided by Section 155.201, a court that has continuing exclusive jurisdiction is not required to transfer the suit affecting the parent-child relationship to the court in which the adoption suit is filed.

(c) A child resides in the county where the child's parents reside or the child's parent resides, if only one parent is living, except that:

(1) if a guardian of the person has been appointed by order of a county or probate court and a managing conservator has not been appointed, the child resides in the county where the guardian of the person resides;

(2) if the parents of the child do not reside in the same county and if a managing conservator, custodian, or guardian of the person has not been appointed, the child resides in the county where the parent having actual care, control, and possession of the child resides;

(3) if the child is in the care and control of an adult other than a parent and a managing conservator, custodian, or guardian of the person has not been appointed, the child resides where the adult having actual care, control, and possession of the child resides;

(4) if the child is in the actual care, control, and possession of an adult other than a parent and the whereabouts of the parent and the guardian of the person is unknown, the child resides where the adult having actual possession, care, and control of the child resides;

(5) if the person whose residence would otherwise determine venue has left the child in the care and control of the adult, the child resides where that adult resides;

(6) if a guardian or custodian of the child has been appointed by order of a court of another state or country, the child resides in the county where the guardian or custodian resides if that person resides in this state; or

(7) if it appears that the child is not under the actual care, control, and possession of an adult, the child resides where the child is found.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 20, Sec. 1, eff. April 20, 1995. Amended by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 62, Sec. 6.14, eff. Sept. 1, 1999.

Amended by:

Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 944 (S.B. 206), Sec. 8, eff. September 1, 2015.

Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 722 (H.B. 369), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2019.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 37 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1996–2024 · leading case: In Re Nabors, 276 S.W.3d 190 (Tex. App. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Nabors, 276 S.W.3d 190 (Tex. App. 2009). · cites it 4× “See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. §§ 103.001(a) (Vernon 2002) (an original suit shall be filed in the county where the child resides unless another court has continuing exclusive jurisdiction); 155.”
In the Interest of S.D., 980 S.W.2d 758 (Tex. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 103.001 (Vernon 1996).”
In Re Oates, 104 S.W.3d 571 (Tex. App. 2003). “” Tex Fam.Code Ann. § 103.001(c) (Vernon 2002).”
In Re Salgado, 53 S.W.3d 752 (Tex. App. 2001). “See Tex.Fam.Code Ann. § 103.001 (venue provisions for original suit under Title 2).”
Doncer v. Dickerson, 81 S.W.3d 349 (Tex. App. 2002). “Tex.Fam.Code Ann. § 103.001(c). This statute is significant not only because it attempts to define a child’s residence but also because it references “actual care, control, and possession.”
In Re Narvaiz, 193 S.W.3d 695 (Tex. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 103.001 (c)(2) (Vernon 2002).”
in Re Dianna Lovell-Osburn, 448 S.W.3d 616 (Tex. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “, Tex. Fam. Code § 103.001; see also In re Nabors, 276 S.”
Arteaga v. Texas Dep't of Prot. & Regulatory Servs., 924 S.W.2d 756 (Tex. App. 1996). “See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 103.001 (West 1996).”
In Re Rowe, 182 S.W.3d 424 (Tex. App. 2005). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 103.001 (Vernon 2002) is the venue statute for an original SAPCR.”
In Re Compton, 185 S.W.3d 526 (Tex. App. 2006). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 103.001(a)(1) (Vernon 2002).”
In Re Ferguson, 172 S.W.3d 122 (Tex. App. 2005). “See also Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 103.001(a)(1) (Vernon 2002).”
McManus v. Wilborn, 932 S.W.2d 662 (Tex. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 103.001(a) (Vernon Supp.”
Show all 37 citing cases →
— Tex. Fam. Code § 103.001(a) — 11 cases
In Re Nabors, 276 S.W.3d 190 (Tex. App. 2009). “See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. §§ 103.001(a) (Vernon 2002) (an original suit shall be filed in the county where the child resides unless another court has continuing exclusive jurisdiction); 155.”
Dohrn v. Delgado, 941 S.W.2d 244 (Tex. App. 1996).
In Re Narvaiz, 193 S.W.3d 695 (Tex. App. 2006). “Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 103.001 (c)(2) (Vernon 2002).”
In the Interest of M.V., 343 S.W.3d 543 (Tex. App. 2011).
McManus v. Wilborn, 932 S.W.2d 662 (Tex. App. 1996). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 103.001(a) (Vernon Supp.”
— Tex. Fam. Code § 103.001(a)(1) — 3 cases
In Re Compton, 185 S.W.3d 526 (Tex. App. 2006). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 103.001(a)(1) (Vernon 2002).”
In Re Ferguson, 172 S.W.3d 122 (Tex. App. 2005). “See also Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 103.001(a)(1) (Vernon 2002).”
in Re: Bret Foreman (Tex. App. 2014).
— Tex. Fam. Code § 103.001(c) — 4 cases
In Re Nabors, 276 S.W.3d 190 (Tex. App. 2009). “See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. §§ 103.001(a) (Vernon 2002) (an original suit shall be filed in the county where the child resides unless another court has continuing exclusive jurisdiction); 155.”
In Re Oates, 104 S.W.3d 571 (Tex. App. 2003). “” Tex Fam.Code Ann. § 103.001(c) (Vernon 2002).”
Doncer v. Dickerson, 81 S.W.3d 349 (Tex. App. 2002). “Tex.Fam.Code Ann. § 103.001(c). This statute is significant not only because it attempts to define a child’s residence but also because it references “actual care, control, and possession.”
Fluor Corp., Fluor Enter., Inc., & Fluor Daniel Mexico, S.A. v. E.D.G.M. (Tex. App. 2022).
— Tex. Fam. Code § 103.001(c)(1) — 3 cases
in the Interest of A.D.P., a Child, 281 S.W.3d 541 (Tex. App. 2008).
In Re Adp, 281 S.W.3d 541 (Tex. App. 2008).
in the Interest of A.D.P., a Child (Tex. App. 2008).
— Tex. Fam. Code § 103.001(c)(2) — 1 case
In Re Lester, 254 S.W.3d 663 (Tex. App. 2008).
— Tex. Fam. Code § 103.001(c)(l) — 1 case
McManus v. Wilborn, 932 S.W.2d 662 (Tex. App. 1996). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 103.001(a) (Vernon Supp.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.