Tex. Codes » Family Code · TITLE 1. THE MARRIAGE RELATIONSHIP · SUBTITLE B. PROPERTY RIGHTS AND LIABILITIES · CHAPTER 3. MARITAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND LIABILITIES
Texas Codes

Tex. Fam. Code § 3.001 (2026)

Separate Property

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 3.001. SEPARATE PROPERTY. A spouse's separate property consists of:

(1) the property owned or claimed by the spouse before marriage;

(2) the property acquired by the spouse during marriage by gift, devise, or descent; and

(3) the recovery for personal injuries sustained by the spouse during marriage, except any recovery for loss of earning capacity during marriage.

Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 7, Sec. 1, eff. April 17, 1997.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 302 cases (65 in the last 5 years), 1998–2026 · leading case: Zagorski v. Zagorski, 116 S.W.3d 309 (Tex. App. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Zagorski v. Zagorski, 116 S.W.3d 309 (Tex. App. 2003). · cites it 4× “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 3.001 (Vernon 1998).”
Monroe v. Monroe, 358 S.W.3d 711 (Tex. App. 2011). · cites it 4× “TEX. FAM.CODE ANN. § 3.001 (West 2006). All other property that is not separate property is community property.”
Viera v. Viera, 331 S.W.3d 195 (Tex. App. 2011). · cites it 3× “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 3.001; Phillips, 296 S.”
Schlueter v. Schlueter, 975 S.W.2d 584 (Tex. 1998). · cites it 2× “Laws 8 , 43)) (current version at Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 3.001 (3)). Likewise, in response to the concern that interspousal suits would result in fraud and collusion between the participants, the Price court stated, "we are unable to distinguish interspousal suits from other…”
In Re Bippert, 311 B.R. 456 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2004). · cites it 6× “See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 3.001 (3) (Vernon 1997) (“[a] spouse’s separate property consists of: .”
Alsenz v. Alsenz, 101 S.W.3d 648 (Tex. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “Royalty Payments In issue three, Richard contends the trial court erred by characterizing the royalty payments he received on his patents during the marriage as community property instead of separate property, thus divesting him of his separate property.”
Gerald Byron Barras v. Leslea Loring Barras, 396 S.W.3d 154 (Tex. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 3.001 (West 2006). The spouse claiming the separate nature of certain property must trace and clearly identify the property claimed to be separate.”
Bush v. Bush, 336 S.W.3d 722 (Tex. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “XVI, § 15; TEX. FAM.CODE ANN. § 3.001(2) (Vernon 2006).”
Young v. Young, 168 S.W.3d 276 (Tex. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 3.002 (Vernon 1998).”
Robles v. Robles, 965 S.W.2d 605 (Tex. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “Laws 8, 43 (current version at TEX.FAM.CODE ANN. § 3.001, 3.002 (Vernon Supp.”
Hill v. Hill, 971 S.W.2d 153 (Tex. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 3.001 (1) (Vernon Pamph.”
Sprague v. Sprague, 363 S.W.3d 788 (Tex. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “XVI, § 15; TEX. FAM.CODE ANN. § 3.001. Community property, on the other hand, consists of all of the property, other than separate property, acquired by either spouse during marriage, and all property possessed by either spouse during the marriage or at its dissolution is…”
Show all 302 citing cases →
— Tex. Fam. Code § 3.001(1) — 32 cases
Chavez v. Chavez, 269 S.W.3d 763 (Tex. App. 2008).
Williams v. Williams, 246 S.W.3d 207 (Tex. App. 2008).
In Re the Marriage of William, 264 S.W.3d 850 (Tex. App. 2008).
Love v. Bailey-Love, 217 S.W.3d 33 (Tex. App. 2006).
Alsenz v. Alsenz, 101 S.W.3d 648 (Tex. App. 2003). “Royalty Payments In issue three, Richard contends the trial court erred by characterizing the royalty payments he received on his patents during the marriage as community property instead of separate property, thus divesting him of his separate property.”
— Tex. Fam. Code § 3.001(1)(2) — 4 cases
Viera v. Viera, 331 S.W.3d 195 (Tex. App. 2011). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 3.001; Phillips, 296 S.”
Newberry v. Newberry, 351 S.W.3d 552 (Tex. App. 2011).
Thomas Mark Richardson v. Julie Ana Richardson, 424 S.W.3d 691 (Tex. App. 2014).
Willie Mark Battle v. Rachel Dominique Battle (Tex. App. 2021).
— Tex. Fam. Code § 3.001(2) — 34 cases
Bush v. Bush, 336 S.W.3d 722 (Tex. App. 2010). “XVI, § 15; TEX. FAM.CODE ANN. § 3.001(2) (Vernon 2006).”
Wells v. Wells, 251 S.W.3d 834 (Tex. App. 2008).
Maldonado v. Maldonado, 556 S.W.3d 407 (Tex. App. 2018).
Hill v. Hill, 971 S.W.2d 153 (Tex. App. 1998). “See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 3.001 (1) (Vernon Pamph.”
in the Matter of the Marriage of John Paul Moncey & Tammie Jo Moncey, 404 S.W.3d 701 (Tex. App. 2013).
— Tex. Fam. Code § 3.001(3) — 8 cases
Harrell v. Hochderffer, 345 S.W.3d 652 (Tex. App. 2011).
Toles v. Toles, 45 S.W.3d 252 (Tex. App. 2001).
Cottone v. Cottone, 122 S.W.3d 211 (Tex. App. 2003).
Wilson v. Wilson, 132 S.W.3d 533 (Tex. App. 2004).
Harrison v. Harrison, 321 S.W.3d 899 (Tex. App. 2010).
— Tex. Fam. Code § 3.001(a)(3) — 1 case
Victor Hamilton v. State (Tex. App. 2014).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.