Texas Codes

Tex. Fam. Code § 6.709 (2026)

Temporary Orders During Appeal

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 6.709. TEMPORARY ORDERS DURING APPEAL. (a) In a suit for dissolution of a marriage, on the motion of a party or on the court's own motion, after notice and hearing, the trial court may render a temporary order as considered equitable and necessary for the preservation of the property and for the protection of the parties during an appeal, including an order directed toward one or both parties:

(1) requiring the support of either spouse;

(2) requiring the payment of reasonable and necessary attorney's fees, court costs, and expenses;

(3) appointing a receiver for the preservation and protection of the property of the parties;

(4) awarding one spouse exclusive occupancy of the parties' residence pending the appeal;

(5) enjoining a party from dissipating or transferring the property awarded to the other party in the trial court's property division; or

(6) suspending the operation of all or part of the property division that is being appealed.

(b) A temporary order under this section enjoining a party from dissipating or transferring the property awarded to the other party in the trial court's property division:

(1) may be rendered without:

(A) the issuance of a bond between the spouses; or

(B) an affidavit or a verified pleading stating specific facts showing that immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result;

(2) is not required to:

(A) define the injury or state why the injury is irreparable; or

(B) include an order setting the suit for trial on the merits with respect to the ultimate relief sought; and

(3) may not prohibit a party's use, transfer, conveyance, or dissipation of the property awarded to the other party in the trial court's property division if the use, transfer, conveyance, or dissipation of the property is for the purpose of suspending the enforcement of the property division that is the subject of the appeal.

(c) A temporary order under this section that suspends the operation of all or part of the property division that is the subject of the appeal may not be rendered unless the trial court takes reasonable steps to ensure that the party awarded property in the trial court's property division is protected from the other party's dissipation or transfer of that property.

(d) In considering a party's request to suspend the enforcement of the property division, the trial court shall consider whether:

(1) any relief granted under Subsection (a) is adequate to protect the party's interest in the property awarded to the party; or

(2) the party who was not awarded the property should also be required to provide security for the appeal in addition to any relief granted under Subsection (a).

(e) If the trial court determines that the party awarded the property can be adequately protected from the other party's dissipation of assets during the appeal only if the other party provides security for the appeal, the trial court shall set the appropriate amount of security, taking into consideration any relief granted under Subsection (a) and the amount of security that the other party would otherwise have to provide by law if relief under Subsection (a) was not granted.

(f) In rendering a temporary order under this section that suspends enforcement of all or part of the property division, the trial court may grant any relief under Subsection (a), in addition to requiring the party who was not awarded the property to post security for that part of the property division to be suspended. The trial court may require that the party who was not awarded the property post all or only part of the security that would otherwise be required by law.

(g) This section does not prevent a party who was not awarded the property from exercising that party's right to suspend the enforcement of the property division as provided by law.

(h) A motion seeking an original temporary order under this section:

(1) may be filed before trial; and

(2) may not be filed by a party after the date by which that party is required to file the party's notice of appeal under the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

(i) The trial court retains jurisdiction to conduct a hearing and sign an original temporary order under this section until the 60th day after the date any eligible party has filed a notice of appeal from final judgment under the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

(j) The trial court retains jurisdiction to modify and enforce a temporary order under this section unless the appellate court, on a proper showing, supersedes the trial court's order.

(k) On the motion of a party or on the court's own motion, after notice and hearing, the trial court may modify a previous temporary order rendered under this section if:

(1) the circumstances of a party have materially and substantially changed since the rendition of the previous order; and

(2) modification is equitable and necessary for the preservation of the property or for the protection of the parties during the appeal.

(l) A party may seek review of the trial court's temporary order under this section by:

(1) motion filed in the court of appeals with jurisdiction or potential jurisdiction over the appeal from the judgment in the case;

(2) proper assignment in the party's brief; or

(3) petition for writ of mandamus.

(m) A temporary order rendered under this section is not subject to interlocutory appeal.

(n) The remedies provided in this section are cumulative of all other remedies allowed by law.

Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 7, Sec. 1, eff. April 17, 1997.

Amended by:

Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 421 (S.B. 1237), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2017.

Acts 2025, 89th Leg., R.S., Ch. 593 (H.B. 2524), Sec. 4, eff. September 1, 2025.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 67 cases (17 in the last 5 years), 1999–2025 · leading case: Bass v. Bass, 106 S.W.3d 311 (Tex. App. 2003).
Bass v. Bass, 106 S.W.3d 311 (Tex. App. 2003). · cites it 6× “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 6.709 (Vernon 1998); see In re Boyd, 34 S.”
In Re Garza, 153 S.W.3d 97 (Tex. App. 2005). · cites it 4× “Tex. Fam. Code ANN. §§ 6.709, 109.001. Here, the trial court could reasonably conclude it was necessary to order Xavier to deposit the funds due Stephanie for equity interest in the homestead in the court’s registry for either of two reasons.”
in Re Miguel Zaragoza Fuentes, 506 S.W.3d 586 (Tex. App. 2016). · cites it 5× “See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 6.709 (West 2006). Her amended motion asserted that “Hearing on this motion must be held within 30 days of perfection of appeal, which occurred on March 4, 2016, and therefore Friday, April 1, 2016 is the deadline for the hearing.”
Fuentes v. Zaragoza, 534 S.W.3d 658 (Tex. App. 2017). · cites it 7× “See Tex. Fam. Code § 6.709. Miguel objected to the motion for temporary orders.”
In Re Merriam, 228 S.W.3d 413 (Tex. App. 2007). · cites it 5× “Compare Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 6.709 with Tex. Fam.”
In Re Sheshtawy, 154 S.W.3d 114 (Tex. 2004). · cites it 2× “TEX. FAM. CODE § 6.709. 6 . In re Sheshtawy, No.”
Michael Monroe Bowers v. Angela Godby Bowers, 510 S.W.3d 571 (Tex. App. 2016). · cites it 3× “While this appeal was pending, Angela moved for a temporary order awarding attorney’s fees in the trial court under Tex. Fam. Code Ann. §§ 6.709 (a) & 109.001 (West 2006 & 2014)(allowing the trial court to issue temporary orders in the event of an appeal from a divorce decree or…”
In Re Boyd, 34 S.W.3d 708 (Tex. App. 2000). · cites it 5× “Tex.Fam.Code Ann. § 6.709(a). 5 . Ex parte Oliver, 736 S.”
Love v. Bailey-Love, 217 S.W.3d 33 (Tex. App. 2006). · cites it 3× “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 6.709 (Vernon 1998).”
Fuentes v. Zaragoza, 555 S.W.3d 141 (Tex. App. 2018). “See TEX. FAM. CODE § 6.709. The trial court ordered Miguel to pay Evangelina $300,000 in monthly support and $50,000 in monthly attorney's fees during the pendency of the appeal.”
Beard v. Beard, 49 S.W.3d 40 (Tex. App. 2001). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 6.709 (Vernon 1998) (temporary orders during appeal).”
Zorilla v. Wahid, 83 S.W.3d 247 (Tex. App. 2002). “The divorce decree provides that the parties are “discharged from all further liabilities and obligations imposed by the temporary orders of this Court.” The provisions of the family code contemplate that the trial court has the authority to issue temporary orders separate and…”
— Tex. Fam. Code § 6.709(2) — 1 case
In Re Garza, 153 S.W.3d 97 (Tex. App. 2005). “Tex. Fam. Code ANN. §§ 6.709, 109.001. Here, the trial court could reasonably conclude it was necessary to order Xavier to deposit the funds due Stephanie for equity interest in the homestead in the court’s registry for either of two reasons.”
— Tex. Fam. Code § 6.709(a) — 15 cases
Fuentes v. Zaragoza, 534 S.W.3d 658 (Tex. App. 2017). “See Tex. Fam. Code § 6.709. Miguel objected to the motion for temporary orders.”
In Re Boyd, 34 S.W.3d 708 (Tex. App. 2000). “Tex.Fam.Code Ann. § 6.709(a). 5 . Ex parte Oliver, 736 S.”
McAlister v. McAlister, 75 S.W.3d 481 (Tex. App. 2002).
Love v. Bailey-Love, 217 S.W.3d 33 (Tex. App. 2006). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 6.709 (Vernon 1998).”
In re Saldana, 380 S.W.3d 890 (Tex. App. 2012).
— Tex. Fam. Code § 6.709(a)(1) — 3 cases
William Jegen v. Sheila Jegen (Tex. App. 2022).
— Tex. Fam. Code § 6.709(a)(2) — 9 cases
Aimee Delyn Halleman v. Edward Charles Halleman, 379 S.W.3d 443 (Tex. App. 2012).
Love v. Bailey-Love, 217 S.W.3d 33 (Tex. App. 2006). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 6.709 (Vernon 1998).”
In Re Merriam, 228 S.W.3d 413 (Tex. App. 2007). “Compare Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 6.709 with Tex. Fam.”
In Re Boyd, 34 S.W.3d 708 (Tex. App. 2000). “Tex.Fam.Code Ann. § 6.709(a). 5 . Ex parte Oliver, 736 S.”
— Tex. Fam. Code § 6.709(a)(3) — 1 case
— Tex. Fam. Code § 6.709(a)(4) — 1 case
— Tex. Fam. Code § 6.709(b) — 8 cases
In Re Sheshtawy, 154 S.W.3d 114 (Tex. 2004). “TEX. FAM. CODE § 6.709. 6 . In re Sheshtawy, No.”
Fuentes v. Zaragoza, 534 S.W.3d 658 (Tex. App. 2017). “See Tex. Fam. Code § 6.709. Miguel objected to the motion for temporary orders.”
In Re Sheshtawy, 161 S.W.3d 1 (Tex. App. 2003).
In Re Merriam, 228 S.W.3d 413 (Tex. App. 2007). “Compare Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 6.709 with Tex. Fam.”
In Re Boyd, 34 S.W.3d 708 (Tex. App. 2000). “Tex.Fam.Code Ann. § 6.709(a). 5 . Ex parte Oliver, 736 S.”
— Tex. Fam. Code § 6.709(i) — 1 case
— Tex. Fam. Code § 6.709(j) — 1 case
— Tex. Fam. Code § 6.709(l) — 2 cases
— Tex. Fam. Code § 6.709(l)(1) — 2 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.