Tex. Codes » Finance Code · TITLE 4. REGULATION OF INTEREST, LOANS, AND FINANCED TRANSACTIONS · SUBTITLE A. INTEREST · CHAPTER 304. JUDGMENT INTEREST
Texas Codes

Tex. Fin. Code § 304.105 (2026)

Effect Of Settlement Offer On Accrual Of Prejudgment Interest

✓ laws through the 89th Legislature (2025)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 304.105. EFFECT OF SETTLEMENT OFFER ON ACCRUAL OF PREJUDGMENT INTEREST. (a) If judgment for a claimant is equal to or less than the amount of a settlement offer of the defendant, prejudgment interest does not accrue on the amount of the judgment during the period that the offer may be accepted.

(b) If judgment for a claimant is more than the amount of a settlement offer of the defendant, prejudgment interest does not accrue on the amount of the settlement offer during the period that the offer may be accepted.

Amended by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 62, Sec. 7.18(a), eff. Sept. 1, 1999.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 25 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1998–2025 · leading case: Susan Meek v. Rockne Onstad Individually &, 430 S.W.3d 601 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Susan Meek v. Rockne Onstad Individually &, 430 S.W.3d 601 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2014). · cites it 8× “) (holding appellant failed to prove one of the settlement offers that he alleged tolled the accrual of prejudgment interest under Texas Finance Code section 304.105). In addition, Onstad failed to prove the amount of the alleged settlement offer, which is necessary to determine…”
Formosa Plastics Corp., USA v. Kajima Int'l, Inc., 216 S.W.3d 436 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2006). · cites it 4× “See TEX. FIN.CODE ANN. § 304.105 (Vernon 2006).”
Qwest Commc'ns Int'l, Inc. v. AT & T Corp., 114 S.W.3d 15 (Tex. App.—Austin 2003). · cites it 2× “See Tex. Fin.Code Ann. § 304.105 (West Supp.2003).”
Jeffrey May v. Ticor Title Ins., 422 S.W.3d 93 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2014). · cites it 2× “We have no occasion to consider the application of Texas Finance Code § 304.105 because the parties have not addressed it in their appellate briefs.”
Figueroa v. Davis, 318 S.W.3d 53 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2010). “” Tex. Fin.Code Ann. § 304.105(b) (emphasis added).”
Shoreline, Inc. v. Hisel, 115 S.W.3d 21 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2003). “Tex. Fin.Code Ann. § 304.105 (Vernon Supp.”
Sembera v. Petrofac Tyler, Inc., 253 S.W.3d 815 (Tex. App.—Tyler 2008). “Tex. Fin.Code Ann. § 304.105(a) (Vernon 2006).”
Foust v. Est. of Walters, 21 S.W.3d 495 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2000). “05, § 6(b), (c) (current version at Tex. Fin.Code § 304.105(a), (b) (Vernon 1999)).”
Head Indus. Coatings & Servs., Inc. v. Maryland Ins. Co., 981 S.W.2d 305 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 1998). “Alternatively, Maryland argues that the running of prejudgment interest on the policy limit of $500,000 was tolled by its settlement offer, citing Tex. Fin.Code Ann. § 304.105 (Vernon 1998) as authority.”
Susan Bobo v. Elezebeth Varughese, 507 S.W.3d 817 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2016). “See Tex. Fin. Code Ann. §§ 304.105 (a), 304.106 (West 2016).”
Non-Party Texas Alcoholic Beverage Comm'n v. Ashley Dominguez, No. 15-25-00139-CV (Tex. App.—15th Dist. Aug. 25, 2025). · cites it 5× “See Tex. Fin. Code § 304.105. M. To the extent Plaintiff is seeking to recover either lost wages or reduced wage-earning capacity, then Plaintiff must prove the loss(es) in the form of a net loss after reduction for income 57 tax payments or unpaid tax liability pursuant to…”
Low, Wyley W. v. Gulf States Utils. Co., 75 S.W.3d 449 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 2000). “— Beaumont 1994, writ denied); Tex.Fin. Code Ann. § 304.105 (Vernon 1998).”
Show all 25 citing cases →
Tex. Fin. Code § 304.105(a): 4 cases
Susan Meek v. Rockne Onstad Individually &, 430 S.W.3d 601 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2014). “) (holding appellant failed to prove one of the settlement offers that he alleged tolled the accrual of prejudgment interest under Texas Finance Code section 304.105). In addition, Onstad failed to prove the amount of the alleged settlement offer, which is necessary to determine…”
Formosa Plastics Corp., USA v. Kajima Int'l, Inc., 216 S.W.3d 436 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2006). “See TEX. FIN.CODE ANN. § 304.105 (Vernon 2006).”
Sembera v. Petrofac Tyler, Inc., 253 S.W.3d 815 (Tex. App.—Tyler 2008). “Tex. Fin.Code Ann. § 304.105(a) (Vernon 2006).”
Foust v. Est. of Walters, 21 S.W.3d 495 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2000). “05, § 6(b), (c) (current version at Tex. Fin.Code § 304.105(a), (b) (Vernon 1999)).”
Tex. Fin. Code § 304.105(b): 1 case
Figueroa v. Davis, 318 S.W.3d 53 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2010). “” Tex. Fin.Code Ann. § 304.105(b) (emphasis added).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.