Sec. 410.205. EFFECT OF DECISION. (a) A decision of the appeals panel regarding benefits is final in the absence of a timely appeal for judicial review.
(b) The decision of the appeals panel regarding benefits is binding during the pendency of an appeal under Subchapter F or G.
Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 269, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1993. Amended by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 955, Sec. 4, eff. Sept. 1, 1999.
Amended by:
Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 265 (H.B. 7), Sec. 3.194, eff. September 1, 2005.
Notes of Decisions
Texas Workers' Comp. Comm'n v. Texas Builders Ins. Co., 994 S.W.2d 902 (Tex. App. 1999).
· cites it 3× “xas Workers’ Compensation Commission, the Subsequent Injury Fund (the “Fund”), and Todd Brown in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Workers’ Compensation Commission (collectively the “Commission”) appeal the final judgment of the trial court declaring that…”
In re in the Est., 543 S.W.3d 397 (Tex. App. 2018).
“at 244 ; see also Tex. Lab. Code § 410.205. At oral argument, counsel for Sosa argued issue preclusion cannot apply because there was a small amount in controversy in the DWC proceeding as compared to this wrongful death action for exemplary damages.”
City of Arlington v. Nadig, 960 S.W.2d 641 (Tex. 1997).
“The trial court reversed the TWCC Appeals Panel’s decision and held that the City was entitled to reimbursement from the TWCC Subsequent Injury Fund pursuant to Tex. Lab.Code § 410.205. Following the TWCC’s refusal to reimburse the City, the City proceeded directly to this Court…”
Tex. Lab. Code § 410.205(a): 2 cases
Tex. Lab. Code § 410.205(b): 6 cases
Tex. Lab. Code § 410.205(c): 6 cases
Texas Workers' Comp. Comm'n v. Texas Builders Ins. Co., 994 S.W.2d 902 (Tex. App. 1999).
“xas Workers’ Compensation Commission, the Subsequent Injury Fund (the “Fund”), and Todd Brown in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Workers’ Compensation Commission (collectively the “Commission”) appeal the final judgment of the trial court declaring that…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.