Sec. 1702.322. LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL. This chapter does not apply to:
(1) a person who has full-time employment as a peace officer and who receives compensation for private employment on an individual or an independent contractor basis as a patrolman, guard, extra job coordinator, or watchman if the officer:
(A) is employed in an employee-employer relationship or employed on an individual contractual basis:
(i) directly by the recipient of the services; or
(ii) by a company licensed under this chapter;
(B) is not in the employ of another peace officer;
(C) is not a reserve peace officer; and
(D) works as a peace officer on the average of at least 32 hours a week, is compensated by the state or a political subdivision of the state at least at the minimum wage, and is entitled to all employee benefits offered to a peace officer by the state or political subdivision;
(2) a reserve peace officer while the reserve officer is performing guard, patrolman, or watchman duties for a county and is being compensated solely by that county;
(3) a peace officer acting in an official capacity in responding to a burglar alarm or detection device; or
(4) a person engaged in the business of electronic monitoring of an individual as a condition of that individual's community supervision, parole, mandatory supervision, or release on bail, if the person does not perform any other service that requires a license under this chapter.
Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 388, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1999. Amended by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 1420, Sec. 14.654, eff. Sept. 1, 2001.
Amended by:
Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 1146 (H.B. 2730), Sec. 4B.17, eff. September 1, 2009.
Acts 2011, 82nd Leg., R.S., Ch. 1247 (S.B. 1600), Sec. 1, eff. June 17, 2011.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
10
cases (
2 in the last 5 years), 2007–2025 · leading case:
Marks v. State, 525 S.W.3d 403 (Tex. App. 2017).
Marks v. State, 525 S.W.3d 403 (Tex. App. 2017).
· cites it 2× “Texas Occupations Code section 1702.322, entitled “Law Enforcement Personnel” provides: This chapter does not apply to: (1) a person who has full-time employment as a peace officer and who receives compensation for private employment on an individual or an independent contractor…”
Baumgart, Eric L. (Tex. App. 2016).
· cites it 6× “2, 8 TEX. OCC. CODE ANN. § 1702.321-1702.332 (West 2012 & Supp.”
Marks v. State, 560 S.W.3d 169 (2018).
“See Tex. Occ. Code § 1702.322(1). See id. § 1702.”
Baumgart, Eric L. (Tex. 2015).
· cites it 4× “See Tex. Occ. Code §1702.322. This exception reads in verbatim: This chapter does not apply to: (1) a person who has full-time employment as a peace officer and who receives compensation for private employment on an individual or an independent contractor basis as a patrolman,…”
Eric L. Baumgart v. State, 533 S.W.3d 380 (Tex. App. 2015).
· cites it 3× “” See Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 1702.322 (West 2012 & Supp.”
Untitled Texas Attorney Gen. Opinion: KP-0479 (Tex. Att'y Gen. 2025).
“TEX. OCC. CODE § 1702.322(1). The Government Code also endorses private law enforcement work, subject to reasonable conditions adopted by the Texas Department of Public Safety.”
— Tex. Occ. Code § 1702.322(1) — 5 cases
Marks v. State, 560 S.W.3d 169 (2018).
“See Tex. Occ. Code § 1702.322(1). See id. § 1702.”
Baumgart, Eric L. (Tex. App. 2016).
“2, 8 TEX. OCC. CODE ANN. § 1702.321-1702.332 (West 2012 & Supp.”
Untitled Texas Attorney Gen. Opinion: KP-0479 (Tex. Att'y Gen. 2025).
“TEX. OCC. CODE § 1702.322(1). The Government Code also endorses private law enforcement work, subject to reasonable conditions adopted by the Texas Department of Public Safety.”
— Tex. Occ. Code § 1702.322(1)(D) — 2 cases
Baumgart, Eric L. (Tex. App. 2016).
“2, 8 TEX. OCC. CODE ANN. § 1702.321-1702.332 (West 2012 & Supp.”
— Tex. Occ. Code § 1702.322(2) — 1 case
— Tex. Occ. Code § 1702.322(3) — 1 case
Baumgart, Eric L. (Tex. App. 2016).
“2, 8 TEX. OCC. CODE ANN. § 1702.321-1702.332 (West 2012 & Supp.”
— Tex. Occ. Code § 1702.322(4) — 1 case
Baumgart, Eric L. (Tex. App. 2016).
“2, 8 TEX. OCC. CODE ANN. § 1702.321-1702.332 (West 2012 & Supp.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.