Tex. Codes » Penal Code · TITLE 1. INTRODUCTORY PROVISIONS · CHAPTER 2. BURDEN OF PROOF
Texas Codes

Tex. Penal Code § 2.01 (2026)

Proof Beyond A Reasonable Doubt

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 2.01. PROOF BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT. All persons are presumed to be innocent and no person may be convicted of an offense unless each element of the offense is proved beyond a reasonable doubt. The fact that he has been arrested, confined, or indicted for, or otherwise charged with, the offense gives rise to no inference of guilt at his trial.

Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 375 cases (14 in the last 5 years), 1982–2026 · leading case: Alvarado v. State, 912 S.W.2d 199 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Alvarado v. State, 912 S.W.2d 199 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “Tex.Penal Code § 2.01; Tex.Code Crim.Proc.”
York v. State, 342 S.W.3d 528 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “[82] TEX. PENAL CODE § 2.01 ("All persons are presumed to be innocent and no person may be convicted of an offense unless each element of the offense is proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”
Allen v. State, 249 S.W.3d 680 (Tex. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “1993); see also Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 2.01 (West 2003); Ward v.”
Sonnier v. State, 913 S.W.2d 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “2d 368 (1970); Tex.Penal Code § 2.01. Appellant acknowledges that in Geesa v.”
Connell v. State, 233 S.W.3d 460 (Tex. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “[1] TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 2.01 (Vernon 2003) ("All persons are presumed to be innocent and no person may be convicted of an offense unless each element of the offense is proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”
Hendrix v. State, 150 S.W.3d 839 (Tex. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “" TEX. PEN.CODE ANN. § 2.01 (Vernon 2003). The errors in the charge for cause number 955264 enabled the jury to possibly return a non-unanimous guilty verdict.”
Weaver v. State, 87 S.W.3d 557 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “The issue is prohibition versus appropriate use. Our Penal Code and Code of Criminal Procedure both provide that "no person may be convicted of an offense unless each element of the offense is proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”
Hanson v. State, 55 S.W.3d 681 (Tex. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “V, § 13; Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 2.01 (West 1994). The Sixth Amendment guarantees a right to trial by jury while the Fourteenth Amendment houses due process protections, which the Supreme Court has determined require juries to find every element of a charged offense beyond a…”
Hacker, Anthony Wayne, 389 S.W.3d 860 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). “Tex. Penal Code § 2.01. 7 . Leonard v. State, 385 S.”
Harrell v. State, 884 S.W.2d 154 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “See TEX.PENAL CODE ANN. § 2.01. [8] The genesis for this "clear" proof standard comes from an oft-quoted passage in Texas Jurisprudence.”
Reckart v. State, 323 S.W.3d 588 (Tex. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “08, and Texas Penal Code section 2.01. See U.S. Const.”
King v. State, 17 S.W.3d 7 (Tex. App. 2000). · cites it 2× “See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 2.01 (Vernon 1994).”
Show all 375 citing cases →
— Tex. Penal Code § 2.01(2003) — 3 cases
Abrego, Jesus Efrain (Tex. App. 2015).
Abrego, Jesus Efrain (Tex. App. 2015).
Valdez, Osbaldo (Tex. App. 2015).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.