Tex. Codes » Utilities Code · TITLE 2. PUBLIC UTILITY REGULATORY ACT · SUBTITLE A. PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL UTILITIES · CHAPTER 15. JUDICIAL REVIEW, ENFORCEMENT, AND PENALTIES
Texas Codes

Tex. Util. Code § 15.001 (2026)

Right To Judicial Review

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 15.001. RIGHT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW. Any party to a proceeding before the commission is entitled to judicial review under the substantial evidence rule.

Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 166, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 112 cases (14 in the last 5 years), 1998–2026 · leading case: Coastal Habitat All. v. Pub. Util. Comm'n, 294 S.W.3d 276 (Tex. App. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Coastal Habitat All. v. Pub. Util. Comm'n, 294 S.W.3d 276 (Tex. App. 2009). · cites it 14× “" Tex. Util.Code Ann. § 15.001 (West 2007).”
In Re TXU Elec. Co., 67 S.W.3d 130 (Tex. 2001). · cites it 4× “See Tex. Util.Code § 15.001; Tex. Gov't Code §§ 2001.”
CenterPoint Energy Houston Elec., LLC v. Gulf Coast Coalition of Cities, 252 S.W.3d 1 (Tex. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “See Tex. Util.Code Ann. § 15.001 (West 2007) (stating that party to proceeding before Commission is entitled to judicial review).”
Texas Indus. Energy Consumers v. Centerpoint Energy Houston Elec., LLC Pub. Util. Comm'n of Texas, 324 S.W.3d 95 (Tex. 2010). · cites it 2× “The CTC at issue in this case was eventually securitized, after the PUC order and the interest-rate period at issue in this appeal. 39 . Application of Centerpoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC for a Competition Transition Charge, PUC Docket No.”
Cities of Corpus Christi v. Pub. Util. Comm'n, 188 S.W.3d 681 (Tex. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “Discussion On appeal, the Cities argue that the Commission erred in determining that AEP's MAB is generation-related and, thus, attributable to AEP's affiliated generation company.”
Sw. Pub. Serv. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm'n of Texas, 962 S.W.2d 207 (Tex. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “See Tex. Util.Code Ann. § 15.001 (West 1998).”
AEP Texas Cent. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm'n of Texas, 258 S.W.3d 272 (Tex. App. 2008). · cites it 4× “See Tex. Util.Code Ann. §§ 15.001, 39.262(j) (West 2007); Tex.”
Pub. Util. Comm'n v. Cities of Harlingen, 311 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “See Tex. Util.Code Ann. § 15.001 (West 2007).”
AEP Texas Com. & Indus. Retail Ltd. P'ship v. Pub. Util. Comm'n, 436 S.W.3d 890 (Tex. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “See Tex. Util.Code § 15.001 (granting right to judicial review); see also Tex.”
Texas Mun. Power Agency v. Pub. Util. Comm'n, 260 S.W.3d 647 (Tex. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “See Tex. Util. Code Ann. § 15.001 (West 2007) (providing for judicial review of Commission orders under the substantial evidence rule); Tex.”
State v. Pub. Util. Com'n of Texas, 344 S.W.3d 349 (Tex. 2011). “Tex. Util.Code § 15.001. 39 . Id. § 39.2620.”
City of El Paso v. Pub. Util. Comm'n, 344 S.W.3d 609 (Tex. App. 2011). “See Tex. Util.Code Ann. § 15.001 (West 2007) (“Any party to a proceeding before the commission is entitled to judicial review under the substantial evidence rule.”
Show all 112 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.