U.S. Code » Title 10 » Subtitle Subtitle A— General Military Law › Part PART II— PERSONNEL › Chapter CHAPTER 39— ACTIVE DUTY

10 U.S.C. § 680

Renumbered § 12312]

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 10 CasesGoogle Scholar

[renumbered]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1969–1999 · leading case: Colonel Roland F. Cinciarelli v. The Honorable Jimmy Carter, President of the United States, 662 F.2d 73 (D.C. Cir. 1981).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Colonel Roland F. Cinciarelli v. The Honorable Jimmy Carter, President of the United States, 662 F.2d 73 (D.C. Cir. 1981). · cites it 3× “This conclusion was based on the language of 10 U.S.C. § 680 (a), in which Congress granted Reserve Officers a right to a hearing before a board of officers prior to involuntary release “during the period of the agreement.”
Brigadier Gen. Roland F. Cinciarelli v. The Honorable Ronald Reagan, President of the United States, 729 F.2d 801 (D.C. Cir. 1984). “” 10 U.S.C. § 680 (1982). On October 17, 1978 the Marines offered Cinciarelli a SWAG providing for five years of active duty service commencing on June 21, 1979.”
Jagnandan v. United States, 17 Cl. Ct. 107 (Ct. Cl. 1989). · cites it 3× “§ 680 (a) provides, in pertinent part: (a) Each agreement made under section 679(a) of this title shall provide that the member may not be released from active duty without his consent during the period of the agreement— (2) for any other reason, without an opportunity to be…”
Hanes v. United States, 44 Fed. Cl. 441 (Fed. Cl. 1999). “” Plaintiff therefore requested that she be discharged as of June 30, 1990, at the completion of her initial service agreement, with separation or severance pay pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 680 (b) (1988) (current version at 10 U.”
John A. Henneberger v. The United States, 407 F.2d 1340 (Ct. Cl. 1969). · cites it 3× “During this period the officer cannot be released, from active duty without his consent, except under the special circumstances set forth in Title 10 U.S.C. § 680 , without an opportunity to be heard.”
Cinciarelli v. Carter, 490 F. Supp. 302 (D.D.C. 1980). “” 10 U.S.C. § 680 (a) (1976). The Court holds as a matter of law that consistent with the statutory scheme, no rights accrued to Col.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.