10 U.S.C. § 933
Art. 133. Conduct unbecoming an officer
Any commissioned officer, cadet, or midshipman who is convicted of conduct unbecoming an officer shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 311
cases (21 in the last 5 years), 1951–2026 · leading case: United States v. Winckelmann, 73 M.J. 11 (C.A.A.F. 2013).
United States v. Winckelmann, 73 M.J. 11 (C.A.A.F. 2013). “30, 2012) (unpublished); Article 133, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 933 (2012). 3 The Court granted review of the following issue: 2 United States v.”
United States v. Forney, 67 M.J. 271 (C.A.A.F. 2009). “Article 133, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 933 (2000). We granted review to determine whether the military judge erred by using a federal statute that the Supreme Court subsequently held to be unconstitutional to define “child pornography.”
Parker v. Levy, 417 U.S. 733 (1974). “" Articles 133 [1] and 134 [2] of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U. S. C. §§ 933 and 934, at issue in this case, trace their legitimacy to that power.”
United States v. Ashby, 68 M.J. 108 (C.A.A.F. 2009). “A separate charge alleging two violations of Article 133, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 933 (2000), conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman, was preferred.”
United States v. Vaughan, 58 M.J. 29 (C.A.A.F. 2003). “In Parker, the Supreme Court gave meaning to these concepts in the context of Article 133, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 933 (2002) and Article 134.1 1 417 U.”
Dep't of the Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352 (1976). “[3] Article 133, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U. S. C. § 933 , states, for example: "Any commissioned officer, cadet, or midshipman who is convicted of conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.”
United States v. Quiroz, 55 M.J. 334 (C.A.A.F. 2001). “133, UCMJ, 10 USC § 933 (conduct unbecoming an officer), and Art.”
United States v. Rogers, 54 M.J. 244 (C.A.A.F. 2000). “1 Violations of Articles 133 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 933 and 934. The disorderly conduct charge (Art.”
United States v. Boyett, 42 M.J. 150 (C.A.A.F. 1995). “Appellant was convicted by a military judge sitting alone, in accordance with his guilty pleas, of violating Article 133, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 933 , for conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman.”
United States v. Conliffe, 67 M.J. 127 (C.A.A.F. 2009). “08-0158/AR ERDMANN, Judge, with whom RYAN, Judge, joins (concurring in part and dissenting in part): I agree with the majority that the offense of conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman under Article 133, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 933 (2000), is…”
Harris v. United States, 102 Fed. Cl. 390 (Fed. Cl. 2011). “Harris, however, was convicted of violating UCMJ Article 133, 10 U.S.C. § 933 , conduct unbecoming an officer, for “wrongfully and dishonorably engaging in sexual activities with Yeoman Seaman__” (omission in original).”
United States v. Simmons, 59 M.J. 485 (C.A.A.F. 2004). “03-0369/AR BAKER, Judge (concurring in part and dissenting in part): I concur in the majority’s treatment of Appellant’s conviction under Article 133, Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. § 933 (2000). However, for the reasons stated below, I…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.