Notes of Decisions
Ali Hamza Ahmad al Bahlul v. United States, 840 F.3d 757 (D.C. Cir. 2016).
· cites it 4× “States designated a foreign terrorist organization, earmarked for training in human-rights advocacy that the donors hope will turn the organization away from terrorist activities? Could the three be shipped off to a military base and tried for material support for terrorism—an…”
Al-Baluchi v. Esper, 392 F. Supp. 3d 46 (D.C. Cir. 2019).
· cites it 10× “al-Baluchi of nine crimes triable by military commission pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 950t. See 2012 Charge Sheet at 13-15, 17-36, 117-19.”
Ali Hamza Ahmad al Bahlul v. United States, 767 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2014).
· cites it 3× “The 2006 MCA specifically enumerated 30 war 6 crimes triable by military commission, see 10 U.S.C. §§ 950t– 950v (2006),1 and conferred jurisdiction on military commissions to try “any offense made punishable by this chapter or the law of war when committed by an alien unlawful…”
Salim Hamdan v. United States, 696 F.3d 1238 (D.C. Cir. 2012).
· cites it 6× “at 2630 (now codified at 10 U.S.C. § 950t). Hamdan argues that Congress lacked authority under Article I of the Constitution – namely, the Define and Punish Clause – to define material support for terrorism as a war crime subject to trial by a U.”
United States v. Al-Nashiri, 191 F. Supp. 3d 1308 (M.C. 2016).
· cites it 8× “The Specification of Charge VII (Attacking Civilians), in violation of 10 U.S.C. § 950t(2), 12 states: In that Abd al Rahim Hussayn Muhammad al NASHIRI (See Appendix A for a list of aliases), an alien unprivileged enemy belligerent subject to trial by military commission, did,…”
In re: Omar Khadr, 823 F.3d 92 (D.C. Cir. 2016).
“See 10 U.S.C. § 950t(25), (29). In 2010, the United States and Khadr reached a plea agreement.”
United States v. Al-Nashiri, 222 F. Supp. 3d 1093 (M.C. 2016).
· cites it 3× “Statement of Facts On September 28, 2011, the Convening Authority referred six charges and seven specifications for trial by a capital military commission pertaining to the explosion in the vicinity of the USS COLE: (I) using treachery or perfidy, 10 U.S.C. § 950t(17); (II)…”
Al Bahlul v. United States, 374 F. Supp. 3d 1250 (Regl. Rail Reorg. Act 2019).
“Title 10 U.S.C. § 950t(1) (2009) punishes "murder of protected persons" with "death or such other punishment as a military commission under this chapter may direct.”
United States v. Al Qosi, 28 F. Supp. 3d 1198 (M.C. 2014).
“POLLARD, Judge: On July 7, 2010, Ibrahim Ahmed Mah-moud al Qosi (“Al Qosi”), in accordance with a written pretrial agreement, pleaded guilty to and was found guilty by a military commission of conspiracy to commit terrorism and provide material support for terrorism, and the…”
Al-Baluchi v. Gates (D.D.C. 2019).
· cites it 9× “al-Baluchi was charged with conspiracy under 10 USC § 950t(29), attacking civilians under 10 USC § 950t(2), attacking civilian objects under 10 USC § 950t(3), intentionally causing serious bodily injury under 10 USC § 950t(13), murder in violation of the law of war under 10 USC…”
Baker v. Spath (D.D.C. 2018).
· cites it 4× “That his actions at the October 27, 2017, hearing do not meet the statutory definition of contempt set forth in 10 U.S.C § 950t(3 l); 2. That Judge Spath, as a military judge, had no authority to unilaterally impose a contempt finding; ' 3.”
Ali Hamza Ahmad al Bahlul v. United States (D.C. Cir. 2014).
· cites it 2× “The 2006 MCA specifically enumerated 30 war 6 crimes triable by military commission, see 10 U.S.C. §§ 950t– 950v (2006),1 and conferred jurisdiction on military commissions to try “any offense made punishable by this chapter or the law of war when committed by an alien unlawful…”
— 10 U.S.C. § 950t(1) — 1 case
Al Bahlul v. United States, 374 F. Supp. 3d 1250 (Regl. Rail Reorg. Act 2019).
“Title 10 U.S.C. § 950t(1) (2009) punishes "murder of protected persons" with "death or such other punishment as a military commission under this chapter may direct.”
— 10 U.S.C. § 950t(13) — 3 cases
Al-Baluchi v. Esper, 392 F. Supp. 3d 46 (D.C. Cir. 2019).
“al-Baluchi of nine crimes triable by military commission pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 950t. See 2012 Charge Sheet at 13-15, 17-36, 117-19.”
Al-Baluchi v. Gates (D.D.C. 2019).
“al-Baluchi was charged with conspiracy under 10 USC § 950t(29), attacking civilians under 10 USC § 950t(2), attacking civilian objects under 10 USC § 950t(3), intentionally causing serious bodily injury under 10 USC § 950t(13), murder in violation of the law of war under 10 USC…”
— 10 U.S.C. § 950t(15) — 3 cases
Al-Baluchi v. Esper, 392 F. Supp. 3d 46 (D.C. Cir. 2019).
“al-Baluchi of nine crimes triable by military commission pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 950t. See 2012 Charge Sheet at 13-15, 17-36, 117-19.”
Al-Baluchi v. Gates (D.D.C. 2019).
“al-Baluchi was charged with conspiracy under 10 USC § 950t(29), attacking civilians under 10 USC § 950t(2), attacking civilian objects under 10 USC § 950t(3), intentionally causing serious bodily injury under 10 USC § 950t(13), murder in violation of the law of war under 10 USC…”
— 10 U.S.C. § 950t(16) — 2 cases
Al-Baluchi v. Esper, 392 F. Supp. 3d 46 (D.C. Cir. 2019).
“al-Baluchi of nine crimes triable by military commission pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 950t. See 2012 Charge Sheet at 13-15, 17-36, 117-19.”
Al-Baluchi v. Gates (D.D.C. 2019).
“al-Baluchi was charged with conspiracy under 10 USC § 950t(29), attacking civilians under 10 USC § 950t(2), attacking civilian objects under 10 USC § 950t(3), intentionally causing serious bodily injury under 10 USC § 950t(13), murder in violation of the law of war under 10 USC…”
— 10 U.S.C. § 950t(17) — 1 case
United States v. Al-Nashiri, 222 F. Supp. 3d 1093 (M.C. 2016).
“Statement of Facts On September 28, 2011, the Convening Authority referred six charges and seven specifications for trial by a capital military commission pertaining to the explosion in the vicinity of the USS COLE: (I) using treachery or perfidy, 10 U.S.C. § 950t(17); (II)…”
— 10 U.S.C. § 950t(2) — 5 cases
United States v. Al-Nashiri, 191 F. Supp. 3d 1308 (M.C. 2016).
“The Specification of Charge VII (Attacking Civilians), in violation of 10 U.S.C. § 950t(2), 12 states: In that Abd al Rahim Hussayn Muhammad al NASHIRI (See Appendix A for a list of aliases), an alien unprivileged enemy belligerent subject to trial by military commission, did,…”
Al-Baluchi v. Esper, 392 F. Supp. 3d 46 (D.C. Cir. 2019).
“al-Baluchi of nine crimes triable by military commission pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 950t. See 2012 Charge Sheet at 13-15, 17-36, 117-19.”
Al-Baluchi v. Gates (D.D.C. 2019).
“al-Baluchi was charged with conspiracy under 10 USC § 950t(29), attacking civilians under 10 USC § 950t(2), attacking civilian objects under 10 USC § 950t(3), intentionally causing serious bodily injury under 10 USC § 950t(13), murder in violation of the law of war under 10 USC…”
— 10 U.S.C. § 950t(23) — 3 cases
United States v. Al-Nashiri, 191 F. Supp. 3d 1308 (M.C. 2016).
“The Specification of Charge VII (Attacking Civilians), in violation of 10 U.S.C. § 950t(2), 12 states: In that Abd al Rahim Hussayn Muhammad al NASHIRI (See Appendix A for a list of aliases), an alien unprivileged enemy belligerent subject to trial by military commission, did,…”
Al-Baluchi v. Esper, 392 F. Supp. 3d 46 (D.C. Cir. 2019).
“al-Baluchi of nine crimes triable by military commission pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 950t. See 2012 Charge Sheet at 13-15, 17-36, 117-19.”
Al-Baluchi v. Gates (D.D.C. 2019).
“al-Baluchi was charged with conspiracy under 10 USC § 950t(29), attacking civilians under 10 USC § 950t(2), attacking civilian objects under 10 USC § 950t(3), intentionally causing serious bodily injury under 10 USC § 950t(13), murder in violation of the law of war under 10 USC…”
— 10 U.S.C. § 950t(24) — 4 cases
United States v. Al-Nashiri, 191 F. Supp. 3d 1308 (M.C. 2016).
“The Specification of Charge VII (Attacking Civilians), in violation of 10 U.S.C. § 950t(2), 12 states: In that Abd al Rahim Hussayn Muhammad al NASHIRI (See Appendix A for a list of aliases), an alien unprivileged enemy belligerent subject to trial by military commission, did,…”
United States v. Al-Nashiri, 222 F. Supp. 3d 1093 (M.C. 2016).
“Statement of Facts On September 28, 2011, the Convening Authority referred six charges and seven specifications for trial by a capital military commission pertaining to the explosion in the vicinity of the USS COLE: (I) using treachery or perfidy, 10 U.S.C. § 950t(17); (II)…”
Al-Baluchi v. Esper, 392 F. Supp. 3d 46 (D.C. Cir. 2019).
“al-Baluchi of nine crimes triable by military commission pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 950t. See 2012 Charge Sheet at 13-15, 17-36, 117-19.”
Al-Baluchi v. Gates (D.D.C. 2019).
“al-Baluchi was charged with conspiracy under 10 USC § 950t(29), attacking civilians under 10 USC § 950t(2), attacking civilian objects under 10 USC § 950t(3), intentionally causing serious bodily injury under 10 USC § 950t(13), murder in violation of the law of war under 10 USC…”
— 10 U.S.C. § 950t(25) — 5 cases
Ali Hamza Ahmad al Bahlul v. United States, 840 F.3d 757 (D.C. Cir. 2016).
“States designated a foreign terrorist organization, earmarked for training in human-rights advocacy that the donors hope will turn the organization away from terrorist activities? Could the three be shipped off to a military base and tried for material support for terrorism—an…”
Salim Hamdan v. United States, 696 F.3d 1238 (D.C. Cir. 2012).
“at 2630 (now codified at 10 U.S.C. § 950t). Hamdan argues that Congress lacked authority under Article I of the Constitution – namely, the Define and Punish Clause – to define material support for terrorism as a war crime subject to trial by a U.”
In re: Omar Khadr, 823 F.3d 92 (D.C. Cir. 2016).
“See 10 U.S.C. § 950t(25), (29). In 2010, the United States and Khadr reached a plea agreement.”
Al-Baluchi v. Esper, 392 F. Supp. 3d 46 (D.C. Cir. 2019).
“al-Baluchi of nine crimes triable by military commission pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 950t. See 2012 Charge Sheet at 13-15, 17-36, 117-19.”
Al-Baluchi v. Gates (D.D.C. 2019).
“al-Baluchi was charged with conspiracy under 10 USC § 950t(29), attacking civilians under 10 USC § 950t(2), attacking civilian objects under 10 USC § 950t(3), intentionally causing serious bodily injury under 10 USC § 950t(13), murder in violation of the law of war under 10 USC…”
— 10 U.S.C. § 950t(26) — 4 cases
Ali Hamza Ahmad al Bahlul v. United States, 840 F.3d 757 (D.C. Cir. 2016).
“States designated a foreign terrorist organization, earmarked for training in human-rights advocacy that the donors hope will turn the organization away from terrorist activities? Could the three be shipped off to a military base and tried for material support for terrorism—an…”
Ali Hamza Ahmad al Bahlul v. United States, 767 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2014).
“The 2006 MCA specifically enumerated 30 war 6 crimes triable by military commission, see 10 U.S.C. §§ 950t– 950v (2006),1 and conferred jurisdiction on military commissions to try “any offense made punishable by this chapter or the law of war when committed by an alien unlawful…”
Salim Hamdan v. United States, 696 F.3d 1238 (D.C. Cir. 2012).
“at 2630 (now codified at 10 U.S.C. § 950t). Hamdan argues that Congress lacked authority under Article I of the Constitution – namely, the Define and Punish Clause – to define material support for terrorism as a war crime subject to trial by a U.”
Ali Hamza Ahmad al Bahlul v. United States (D.C. Cir. 2014).
“The 2006 MCA specifically enumerated 30 war 6 crimes triable by military commission, see 10 U.S.C. §§ 950t– 950v (2006),1 and conferred jurisdiction on military commissions to try “any offense made punishable by this chapter or the law of war when committed by an alien unlawful…”
— 10 U.S.C. § 950t(29) — 4 cases
Al-Baluchi v. Esper, 392 F. Supp. 3d 46 (D.C. Cir. 2019).
“al-Baluchi of nine crimes triable by military commission pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 950t. See 2012 Charge Sheet at 13-15, 17-36, 117-19.”
United States v. Al Qosi, 28 F. Supp. 3d 1198 (M.C. 2014).
“POLLARD, Judge: On July 7, 2010, Ibrahim Ahmed Mah-moud al Qosi (“Al Qosi”), in accordance with a written pretrial agreement, pleaded guilty to and was found guilty by a military commission of conspiracy to commit terrorism and provide material support for terrorism, and the…”
Al-Baluchi v. Gates (D.D.C. 2019).
“al-Baluchi was charged with conspiracy under 10 USC § 950t(29), attacking civilians under 10 USC § 950t(2), attacking civilian objects under 10 USC § 950t(3), intentionally causing serious bodily injury under 10 USC § 950t(13), murder in violation of the law of war under 10 USC…”
— 10 U.S.C. § 950t(3) — 3 cases
United States v. Al-Nashiri, 191 F. Supp. 3d 1308 (M.C. 2016).
“The Specification of Charge VII (Attacking Civilians), in violation of 10 U.S.C. § 950t(2), 12 states: In that Abd al Rahim Hussayn Muhammad al NASHIRI (See Appendix A for a list of aliases), an alien unprivileged enemy belligerent subject to trial by military commission, did,…”
Al-Baluchi v. Esper, 392 F. Supp. 3d 46 (D.C. Cir. 2019).
“al-Baluchi of nine crimes triable by military commission pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 950t. See 2012 Charge Sheet at 13-15, 17-36, 117-19.”
Al-Baluchi v. Gates (D.D.C. 2019).
“al-Baluchi was charged with conspiracy under 10 USC § 950t(29), attacking civilians under 10 USC § 950t(2), attacking civilian objects under 10 USC § 950t(3), intentionally causing serious bodily injury under 10 USC § 950t(13), murder in violation of the law of war under 10 USC…”
— 10 U.S.C. § 950t(31) — 1 case
Baker v. Spath (D.D.C. 2018).
“That his actions at the October 27, 2017, hearing do not meet the statutory definition of contempt set forth in 10 U.S.C § 950t(3 l); 2. That Judge Spath, as a military judge, had no authority to unilaterally impose a contempt finding; ' 3.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.