Notes of Decisions
Cox v. Porsche Fin. Servs., Inc., 342 F. Supp. 3d 1271 (S.D. Fla. 2018).
“" 15 U.S.C. § 1667f(a)(1), (b)(1). Those regulations, collectively referred to as "Regulation M," are codified at 12 C.”
Pettola v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp., 44 F. Supp. 2d 442 (D. Conn. 1999).
“” 15 U.S.C. § 1667f(a)(l). Following the passage of the CLA on March 23, 1976, the Federal Reserve Board initially expanded the old Regulation Z to cover the CLA.”
Torres v. Banc One Leasing Corp., 226 F. Supp. 2d 1345 (N.D. Ga. 2002).
“Plaintiff contends that the early termination formula violates the Act because it makes an early terminating lessee responsible for covering any shortfall in the vehicle’s actual realized value as against the projected end of lease residual value. As there is no genuine issue of…”
Kennedy v. BMW Fin. Servs., N.A., 363 F. Supp. 2d 110 (D. Conn. 2005).
“In passing the CLA, Congress also delegated to the Federal Reserve Board authority “to issue regulations ‘to update and clarify the requirements and definitions applicable to lease disclosures’ ” and to publish “model disclosure forms to facilitate compliance with [the…”
Hildabrand v. DiFeo P'ship, Inc., 89 F. Supp. 2d 202 (D. Conn. 2000).
“” 15 U.S.C. § 1667f(b)(4). Plaintiff does not dispute that the lease agreement section entitled “Federal Consumer Leasing Act Disclosures” contains the exact terms and language as set forth in the model closed-end lease form.”
United States v. Nicole Schuster (3rd Cir. 2026).
“, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1667f(b)(1), (4) (“relates” indicates a direct connection between particular disclosure forms and a “transaction” or “disclosure requirements”); 15 U.”
United States v. Nicole Schuster (3rd Cir. 2026).
“, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1667f(b)(1), (4) (“relates” indicates a direct connection between particular disclosure forms and a “transaction” or “disclosure requirements”); 15 U.”
— 15 U.S.C. § 1667f(a)(1) — 2 cases
Cox v. Porsche Fin. Servs., Inc., 342 F. Supp. 3d 1271 (S.D. Fla. 2018).
“" 15 U.S.C. § 1667f(a)(1), (b)(1). Those regulations, collectively referred to as "Regulation M," are codified at 12 C.”
— 15 U.S.C. § 1667f(a)(l) — 2 cases
Pettola v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp., 44 F. Supp. 2d 442 (D. Conn. 1999).
“” 15 U.S.C. § 1667f(a)(l). Following the passage of the CLA on March 23, 1976, the Federal Reserve Board initially expanded the old Regulation Z to cover the CLA.”
Kennedy v. BMW Fin. Servs., N.A., 363 F. Supp. 2d 110 (D. Conn. 2005).
“In passing the CLA, Congress also delegated to the Federal Reserve Board authority “to issue regulations ‘to update and clarify the requirements and definitions applicable to lease disclosures’ ” and to publish “model disclosure forms to facilitate compliance with [the…”
— 15 U.S.C. § 1667f(b)(1) — 2 cases
United States v. Nicole Schuster (3rd Cir. 2026).
“, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1667f(b)(1), (4) (“relates” indicates a direct connection between particular disclosure forms and a “transaction” or “disclosure requirements”); 15 U.”
United States v. Nicole Schuster (3rd Cir. 2026).
“, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1667f(b)(1), (4) (“relates” indicates a direct connection between particular disclosure forms and a “transaction” or “disclosure requirements”); 15 U.”
— 15 U.S.C. § 1667f(b)(4) — 1 case
Hildabrand v. DiFeo P'ship, Inc., 89 F. Supp. 2d 202 (D. Conn. 2000).
“” 15 U.S.C. § 1667f(b)(4). Plaintiff does not dispute that the lease agreement section entitled “Federal Consumer Leasing Act Disclosures” contains the exact terms and language as set forth in the model closed-end lease form.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.