15 U.S.C. § 5903

Relation to other laws

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter shall supersede any provision of State law (or the law of any political subdivision of a State) that is inconsistent with this chapter.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 2002–2011 · leading case: Favel v. Am. Renovation & Constr. Co., 2002 MT 266 (Mont. 2002).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Favel v. Am. Renovation & Constr. Co., 2002 MT 266 (Mont. 2002). · cites it 2× “§ 1144 (a) (2001) ("Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, the provisions of this subchapter and subchapter III of this chapter shall supersede any and all State laws insofar as they may now or hereafter relate to any employee benefit plan described in section…”

Smith v. United States, 20 A.3d 759 (D.C. 2011). · cites it 2× “” 15 U.S.C. § 5903 (2006). Even taken on its face, appellant’s preemption argument fails.”

Reidelbach v. Burlington N. & Santa Fe Ry. Co., 2002 MT 289 (Mont. 2002). “§ 1144 (a) (2001) (“Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, the provisions of this subchapter and subchapter III of this chapter shall supersede any and all State laws insofar as they may now or hereafter relate to any employee benefit plan described in section…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.