All public lands of the United States situated north of township 60 north in the Counties of Cook and Lake, State of Minnesota, including the natural shore lines of Lake Superior within such area; all public lands of the United States situated in that part of St. Louis County, State of Minnesota, lying north of a line beginning at the northeast corner of Township 63 north, Range 12 west, 4th P. M., thence westerly along the township line to the southwest corner of Township 64 north, Range 18 west, 4th P. M., thence northerly to the northwest corner of Township 65 north, Range 18 west, 4th P. M., thence westerly to the southwest corner, Township 66 north, Range 21 west, 4th P. M., thence northerly along the Township line to its intersection with the international boundary between the United States and the Dominion of Canada; all public lands of the United States on the shore lines of the lakes and streams forming the international boundary, so far as such lands lie within the areas heretofore described in this section; all public lands of the United States in that part of the Superior National Forest located in Townships 61 and 62, Ranges 12 and 13 west, 4th P. M.; and all public lands of the United States on the shore lines of Burntside Lake and Lake Vermilion, State of Minnesota, are withdrawn from all forms of entry or appropriation under the public land laws of the United States, subject to prior existing legal rights initiated under the public land laws, so long as such claims are maintained as required by the applicable law or laws and subject to such permits and licenses as may be granted or issued by the Department of Agriculture under laws or regulations generally applicable to national forests.
Notes of Decisions
Snowbank Enter., Inc. v. United States, 6 Cl. Ct. 476 (Ct. Cl. 1984).
“Thereafter, congressional action to protect the area included: the Shipstead-Nolan Act of 1930, 16 U.S.C. §§ 577 -577b, which protected the area’s lakeshores by prohibiting the building of dams; the Thye-Blatnik Act of 1948, 16 U.”
Bydlon v. United States, 175 F. Supp. 891 (Ct. Cl. 1959).
· cites it 4× “1020 ; 16 U.S.C.A. § 577 et seq., withdrew from entry all public lands in a described portion of the Minnesota boundary region, including some lands outside of the Superior National Forest, prohibited logging on public lands within certain distances of shorelines, and forbade…”
Nat'l Ass'n of Prop. Owners v. United States, 499 F. Supp. 1223 (D. Minnesota 1980).
· cites it 2× “In 1930, Congress enacted the ShipsteadNewton-Nolan Act, 16 U.S.C. § 577 et seq. (1976), which prohibited logging within 400 feet of any lakeshore, and regulated the waters and water levels within the Superior National Forest.”
Hedstrom Lumber Co. v. United States, 7 Cl. Ct. 16 (Ct. Cl. 1984).
“Thereafter, congressional action to protect the area included: the Ship-stead-Nolan Act of 1930, 16 U.S.C. §§ 577 -577b, which protected the area’s lakeshores by prohibiting the building of dams; the Thye-Blatnik Act of 1948, 16 U.”
Minnesota Pub. Interest Rsch. Grp. v. Butz, 358 F. Supp. 584 (D. Minnesota 1973).
“In 1930, Congress passed the Shipstead-Newton-Nolan Act, 16 U.S.C. § 577 , to conserve the natural beauty of shorelines of lakes and streams for recreational use.”
Izaak Walton League of Am. v. St. Clair, 353 F. Supp. 698 (D. Minnesota 1973).
· cites it 2× “4 By the Thye-Blatnik Act of June 1948, as later amended, the Secretary of Agriculture was given authority to purchase land from private individuals, subject however to 16 U.S.C.”
Minnesota Pub. Interest Rsch. Grp. v. Butz, 401 F. Supp. 1276 (D. Minnesota 1975).
· cites it 2× “In 1930, Congress passed the Ship-stead-Newton-Nolan Act, 16 U.S.C. § 577 , to conserve the natural beauty of shorelines of lakes and streams for recreational use.”
Minnesota v. Block, 660 F.2d 1240 (8th Cir. 1981).
“In 1930, Congress enacted the Shipstead-Nolan Act, 16 U.S.C. § 577 et seq. (1976), to protect the natural features and forests of the area by prohibiting logging within 400 feet of any lake shore and restricting alteration of water or water levels.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.