19 U.S.C. § 1593
Repealed. June 25, 1948, ch. 645, § 21, 62 Stat. 862, eff. Sept. 1, 1948
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 44
cases, 1931–2000 · leading case: United States v. Theodore Edmonds, 80 F.3d 810 (3rd Cir. 1996).
United States v. Theodore Edmonds, 80 F.3d 810 (3rd Cir. 1996). “was derived from 19 U.S.C. § 1593 (a), which in turn had as its source R.”
Palmero v. United States, 112 F.2d 922 (1st Cir. 1940). “§§ 173 , 174, and in violation of the Tariff Act of 3930, Title 19 U.S.C.A. § 1593 (b), and with conspiracy to violate the Narcotic Drugs Import and Export Act.”
In Re Caffey, 441 P.2d 933 (Cal. 1968). “§ 2593 (a), now §4744), 2 and unlawful concealment and transportation of marijuana after importing it without invoice or declara *765 tion (former 19 U.S.C. § 1593 (b), now 18 U.S.C. §545 ).”
Marino v. United States, 91 F.2d 691 (9th Cir. 1937). “The indictment charged that defendants "on or about the 1st day of August, 1934, and continuously thereafter down to and including the date of finding and presenting of this indictment * * *," which was on March 12, 1936, conspired to violate 19 U.S.C.A. § 1593 (a) and (b), and…”
United States v. Mueller, 178 F.2d 593 (5th Cir. 1950). “This court is called on first to decide whether or not the Congress intended to withdraw lottery tickets from the general term merchandise as found in 19 U.S.C.A. § 1593 (b), when it enacted 18 U.”
United States v. Kushner, 135 F.2d 668 (2d Cir. 1943). “Five counts of an indictment brought in the district court against the appellant herein, Bernard Kushner, together with four codefendants, accused him of violating the Customs Act, 19 U.S.C.A. §§ 1593 (a), 1593(b), and § 483(b), by importing and assisting the importation of…”
In Re No. 32 East Sixty-Seventh Street, 96 F.2d 153 (2d Cir. 1938). “that he had been actively engaged in a John Doe-investigation ; that between September 1 and December 15, 1937, John Doe, whose true name was unknown to the deponent, had fraudulently imported into the United States merchandise, described as in the search warrant, and had…”
Jeffers v. United States, 187 F.2d 498 (D.C. Cir. 1951). “751 (1930), 19 U.S.C.A. § 1593 (b) (1927), were seized by a customs agent under a search warrant later quashed because issued without a showing of probable cause.”
United States v. Eight Boxes Containing Various Articles of Miscellaneous Merch., 105 F.2d 896 (2d Cir. 1939). “The court properly found that the goods in question were imported contrary to law and were therefore subject to forfeiture under Section 593(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C.A. § 1593 (b). See 28 U.S.C.A. § 736 .”
United States v. Nardone, 90 F.2d 630 (2d Cir. 1937). “§ 550 , by smuggling a large quantity of alcohol into the Port of New York; the second count charged the violation of 19 U.S.C.A. § 1593 (a), by receiving and concealing the smuggled alcohol in the Southern District; and the third count charged a conspiracy to violate the…”
United States v. Ahmad, 213 F.3d 805 (4th Cir. 2000). “751 (codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1593 (1940)), repealed by Act of June 25, 1948, ch.”
Guarneri v. Kessler, 98 F.2d 580 (5th Cir. 1938). “On April 6, 1936, he pleaded guilty in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana to an indictment which charged him and fifteen other named persons with conspiring to smuggle, import and bring into the United States some 6,000 gallons of alcohol fit…”
— 19 U.S.C. § 1593(a) — 1 case
United States v. Nardone, 90 F.2d 630 (2d Cir. 1937). “§ 550 , by smuggling a large quantity of alcohol into the Port of New York; the second count charged the violation of 19 U.S.C.A. § 1593 (a), by receiving and concealing the smuggled alcohol in the Southern District; and the third count charged a conspiracy to violate the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.