19 U.S.C. § 1628

Exchange of information

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 19 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) In generalThe Secretary may by regulation authorize customs officers to exchange information or documents with foreign customs and law enforcement agencies if the Secretary reasonably believes the exchange of information is necessary to—(1) insure compliance with any law or regulation enforced or administered by the Customs Service;(2) administer or enforce multilateral or bilateral agreements to which the United States is a party;(3) assist in investigative, judicial and quasi-judicial proceedings in the United States; and(4) an action comparable to any of those described in paragraphs (1) through (4) 11 So in original. Probably should be “(3)”. undertaken by a foreign customs or law enforcement agency, or in relation to a proceeding in a foreign country.(b) Nondisclosure and uses of information provided(1) Information may be provided to foreign customs and law enforcement agencies under subsection (a) only if the Secretary obtains assurances from such agencies that such information will be held in confidence and used only for the law enforcement purposes for which such information is provided to such agencies by the Secretary.(2) No information may be provided under subsection (a) to any foreign customs or law enforcement agency that has violated any assurances described in paragraph (1).(c) Government agency of USMCA country(1) In generalThe Secretary may authorize U.S. Customs and Border Protection to exchange information with any government agency of a USMCA country, if the Secretary—(A) reasonably believes the exchange of information is necessary to implement chapter 2, 4, 5, 6, or 7 of the USMCA; and(B) obtains assurances from such agency that the information will be held in confidence and used only for governmental purposes.(2) Definitions

In this subsection, the terms “USMCA” and “USMCA country” have the meanings given those terms in section 4502 of this title.

(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, § 628, as added Pub. L. 99–570, title III, § 3127, Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3207–89; amended Pub. L. 103–182, title II, § 209, Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2098; Pub. L. 116–113, title II, § 209(c), Jan. 29, 2020, 134 Stat. 52.)Editorial NotesAmendments

2020—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 116–113 added subsec. (c) and struck out former subsec. (c). Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “The Secretary may authorize the Customs Service to exchange information with any government agency of a NAFTA country, as defined in section 3301(4) of this title, if the Secretary—

“(1) reasonably believes the exchange of information is necessary to implement chapter 3, 4, or 5 of the North American Free Trade Agreement, and

“(2) obtains assurances from such country that the information will be held in confidence and used only for governmental purposes.”

1993—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 103–182 added subsec. (c).

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 2020 Amendment; Retention of Authority To Exchange Information

Amendment by Pub. L. 116–113 effective on the date the USMCA enters into force (July 1, 2020) and applicable with respect to goods entered for consumption, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after that date, see section 209(d) of Pub. L. 116–113, set out as an Effective Date of 2020 Amendment note under section 1304 of this title.

Pub. L. 116–113, title II, § 209(e), Jan. 29, 2020, 134 Stat. 53, provided that: “Notwithstanding the amendment made by subsection (c) [amending this section], the Secretary of the Treasury shall retain the authority provided in section 628(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 [19 U.S.C. 1628(c)] (as in effect on the day before the date on which the USMCA enters into force [July 1, 2020]) to exchange information with any government agency of a NAFTA country (as defined in section 2 of the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act [19 U.S.C. 3301] (as in effect on the day before the date on which the USMCA enters into force)).”

[For definition of “USMCA” as used in section 209(e) of Pub. L. 116–113, set out above, see section 4502 of this title.]

Effective Date of 1993 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–182 effective on the date the North American Free Trade Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States (Jan. 1, 1994), see section 213(b) of Pub. L. 103–182, formerly set out as an Effective Date note under former section 3331 of this title.

Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions, personnel, assets, and liabilities of the United States Customs Service of the Department of the Treasury, including functions of the Secretary of the Treasury relating thereto, to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 203(1), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6. For establishment of U.S. Customs and Border Protection in the Department of Homeland Security, treated as if included in Pub. L. 107–296 as of Nov. 25, 2002, see section 211 of Title 6, as amended generally by Pub. L. 114–125, and section 802(b) of Pub. L. 114–125, set out as a note under section 211 of Title 6.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2015–2016 · leading case: Kwo Lee, Inc. v. United States, 2015 CIT 56 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2015).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Kwo Lee, Inc. v. United States, 2015 CIT 56 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2015). “” 19 U.S.C. § 1628 (a). This is reflected in the language of the regulation, which provides that “if a port director or drawback office believes” that the current level of bonding “would place the revenue in jeopardy or otherwise hamper the enforcement of Customs laws or…”

Premier Trading, Inc. v. United States, 2016 CIT 13 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2016). “Accordingly, Plaintiffs motion is denied.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.