19 U.S.C. § 81h

Rules and regulations

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 19 CasesGoogle Scholar

The Board shall prescribe such rules and regulations not inconsistent with the provisions of this chapter or the rules and regulations of the Secretary of the Treasury made hereunder and as may be necessary to carry out this chapter.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1967–2020 · leading case: Nissan Motor Mfg. Corp., USA v. United States, 693 F. Supp. 1183 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1988).
Nissan Motor Mfg. Corp., USA v. United States, 693 F. Supp. 1183 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1988). · cites it 2× “In 1952 the Board promulgated regulations pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 81h to authorize “zones for specialized purposes” or “subzones” in areas separate from existing free trade zones “for one or more of the specialized purposes of storing, manipulating, manufacturing, or exhibiting…”
Conoco, Inc. v. United States Foreign-Trade Zones Bd., 885 F. Supp. 257 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1995). · cites it 2× “” 19 U.S.C. § 81h (emphasis added). These two provisions complement the Board’s general grants of authority which Congress has set forth in 19 U.”
Nissan Motor Mfg. Corp., U.S.A. v. The United States, 884 F.2d 1375 (Fed. Cir. 1989). “According to the trial court: In 1952 the Board promulgated regulations pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 81h to authorize “zones for specialized purposes” or “subzones” in areas separate from existing free trade zones “for one or more of the specialized purposes of storing, manipulating,…”
Fountain v. New Orleans Pub. Serv., Inc., 265 F. Supp. 630 (E.D. La. 1967). “§ 81a(e) and the regulations adopted under 19 U.S.C. § 81h define a “public corporation” to include a State or a political subdivision or public agency thereof.”
Citgo Petroleum Corp. v. United States Foreign Trade-Zones Bd., 83 F.3d 397 (Fed. Cir. 1996). “Imposing a condition that limited the subzone benefits for foreign crude oil used as fuel was a less restrictive measure that both offered Citgo some subzone advantages and at the same time was tailored to avoid disadvantaging Citgo’s domestic competitors. Such a condition was…”
Prsi Trading, Llc v. Harris Cnty., Texas (Tex. 2020). “32 25 19 U.S.C. § 81h. 26 “The Foreign-Trade Zones Act is administered through two sets of regulations, the FTZ Regulations (15 CFR Part 400) and [Customs] Regulations (19 CFR Part 146).”
Harris Cnty. v. Harris Cnty. Appraisal Dist., 554 S.W.3d 708 (Tex. App. 2018). “OPINION DISSENTING FROM DENIAL OF EN BANC RECONSIDERATION 19 U.S.C. § 81h ("The Board shall prescribe such rules and regulations not inconsistent with the provisions of this chapter or the rules and regulations of the Secretary of the Treasury made hereunder and as may be…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.