U.S. Code » Title 2 » Chapter CHAPTER 51— HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES LEADERSHIP › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER III— MAJORITY AND MINORITY LEADERS AND WHIPS

2 U.S.C. § 2

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 2 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) The first section of this resolution shall not affect or change the appointments or continuity of employment of those employees who hold such positions on the date of adoption of this resolution [June 17, 1969].“(b) In accordance with the authority of the House of Representatives under subparagraph (3) of the first section of this resolution, the respective per annum gross rates of pay of those positions for which position titles are provided by clauses (C), (D), (E), and (F) of subparagraph (1) of the first section of this resolution are as follows:“(1) for the position subject to clause (C)—$29,160;“(2) for the position subject to clause (D)—$25,200;“(3) for the position subject to clause (E)—$28,440; and“(4) for the position subject to subparagraph (F)—$28,080.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17 cases, 1945–2016 · leading case: Larios v. Cox, 300 F. Supp. 2d 1320 (N.D. Ga. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Larios v. Cox, 300 F. Supp. 2d 1320 (N.D. Ga. 2004). · cites it 2× “In orders dated August 29, 2003, and October 15, 2003, we ruled on the defendant’s motions to dismiss, ultimately dismissing the plaintiffs’ 2 U.S.C. § 2 claim and the plaintiffs’ Equal Protection claim challenging the combination of single- and multi-member districts in the…”
Wright v. Rockefeller, 211 F. Supp. 460 (S.D.N.Y. 1962). · cites it 2× “In connection with each decennial census from 1840 to 1910, with the exception of the census of 1850, Congress enacted a law of this character.”
Wesberry v. Vandiver, 206 F. Supp. 276 (N.D. Ga. 1962). · cites it 2× “13 (1929), Title 2 U.S. C.A. § 2. Under that Act Georgia lost two seats in the House and the statute here under attack followed in 1931.”
Mauldin v. Branch, 866 So. 2d 429 (Miss. 2003). “if there is a decrease in the number of Representatives and the number of districts in such State exceeds such decreased number of Representatives, they shall be elected from the State at large.”
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians v. Riverside Cnty., 181 F. Supp. 3d 725 (C.D. Cal. 2016). “2d 573 (1962) ( 2 U.S.C. §§ 2 , 9 did hot delegate power to grant fishing rights to Indians who had not been provided with Reservations); Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe v.”
Cao v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 688 F. Supp. 2d 498 (E.D. La. 2010). “I, § 2; 2 U.S.C. § 2 . There are 100 seats in the U.”
Newdow v. Roberts, 603 F.3d 1002 (D.C. Cir. 2010). “(citing 2 U.S.C. § 2 (a)). In other words, the Commerce Secretary was legally responsible for providing the President with advice and information on which he would base his final decision.”
Smith v. Clark, 189 F. Supp. 2d 548 (S.D. Miss. 2002). “2 U.S.C. § 2 (a)(c). This plainly implies that states can redistrict according to the *552 "laws thereof.”
Harris v. Anderson, 400 P.2d 25 (Kan. 1965). “The membership of the House of Representatives has been fixed at 435 ( 2 U.S.C.A. § 2 ), leaving 385 seats to be apportioned to the several states on the basis of population in accordance with the method of equal proportions.”
Saunders v. Wilkins, 152 F.2d 235 (4th Cir. 1945). “…of Population. The total number of representatives is fixed at 435 by the Act of February 14, 1912, 87 Stat. 1728 , 2 U.S.C.A. § 2 .”
In re Polsley, 86 P.3d 531 (Kan. 2004). “§ 641 and 2 U.S.C. § 2 , theft of government property, a misdemeanor.”
In re Polsley, 85 P.3d 693 (Kan. 2004). “§ 641 and 2 U.S.C. § 2 , theft of government property, a misdemeanor.”
Show all 17 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.