2 U.S.C. § 31
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1976–2026 · leading case: United States v. Windsor, 133 S. Ct. 2675 (2013).
United States v. Windsor, 133 S. Ct. 2675 (2013). “A similar statute prohibits Senators, Senate employees, and their spouses from ac- cepting high-value gifts from certain sources, see 2 U. S. C. §31–2(a)(1), and another mandates detailed finan- cial disclosures by numerous high-ranking officials and their spouses.”
John Boehner v. Donnald K. Anderson, Clerk of the House Martha S. Pope, Sec'y of the Senate William J. Clinton, President of the United States, 30 F.3d 156 (D.C. Cir. 1994). “1716 (1989) (codified at 2 U.S.C. § 31 (2) and 5 U.S.C. § 5318 note).”
Atkins v. United States, 214 Ct. Cl. 186 (Ct. Cl. 1977). “421 (codified at 2 U.S.C. § 31 (Supp. V, 1975)), was enacted.”
Pressler v. Simon, 428 F. Supp. 302 (D.D.C. 1976). “(“Salary Act”) and the Executive Salary Cost-of-Living Adjustment Act of 1975,' 2 U.S.C. § 31 (“Adjustment Act”), which provide procedures to set new rates of compensation for members of Congress are unconstitutional, and to enjoin increased disbursements to members of Congress…”
Shaffer v. Clinton, 54 F. Supp. 2d 1014 (D. Colo. 1999). “1716 (1989), codified at 2 U.S.C. § 31 (2). The Twenty-seventh Amendment provides, in its entirety: “No law varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives shall take effect until an election of Representatives shall have intervened.”
Humphrey v. Baker, 665 F. Supp. 23 (D.D.C. 1987). “In Pressler , a three judge panel of this Court found that a Congressman who sought to challenge the constitutionality of the Salary Act and of the Executive Cost-of-Living Adjustment Act of 1975, 2 U.S.C. § 31 , had alleged an injury sufficient to confer standing because…”
Ruth v. Cong. of United States, 71 F.R.D. 676 (D.N.J. 1976). “§ 44 , for circuit court judges, among others, such as 2 U.S.C. § 31 , establishing the salaries of members of Congress, but see footnote 5.”
Pressler v. Blumenthal, 431 U.S. 169 (1977). “§§ 351-361 , and of the 1975 Executive Salary Cost-of-Living Adjustment Act, 2 U. S. C. § 31 (1970 ed., Supp. V), relating to increases in salaries paid members of Congress.”
Putnam v. United States, 826 F. Supp. 988 (W.D. La. 1993). “§ 5702 (relating to certain travel and subsistence expenses of governmental employees).”
DAVIS v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2026). “§ 4501 was previously codified at 2 U.S.C. § 31 . For simplicity’s sake, we treat that section as though it was codified at 2 U.”
United States v. Windsor (2013). “A similar statute prohibits Senators, Senate employees, and their spouses from ac- cepting high-value gifts from certain sources, see 2 U. S. C. §31–2(a)(1), and another mandates detailed finan- cial disclosures by numerous high-ranking officials and their spouses.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.