2 U.S.C. § 437a
Repealed. Pub. L. 94–283, title I, § 105, May 11, 1976, 90 Stat. 481
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1975–2014 · leading case: McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003).
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “at 843^4 (striking down disclosure provision 2 U.S.C. § 437a). In 1976, the Supreme Court affirmed in part and reversed in part the D.”
Buckley v. Valeo, 519 F.2d 821 (D.C. Cir. 1975). “In the light of this scrutiny, we do find one section, 2 U.S.C. § 437a, unconstitutional on First Amendment right of association and free speech grounds.”
New York Civil Liberties Union, Inc. v. Acito, 459 F. Supp. 75 (S.D.N.Y. 1978). “Section 308 of the Act, 2 U.S.C. § 437a, provides that any organization “expendpng] any funds .”
Buckley v. Valeo, 532 F.2d 187 (D.C. Cir. 1976). “” Enforcement necessitates further modification of the order of August 15, 1975 as follows: In the answer to Certified Question 9, delete all after “YES as to 2 U.S.C. § 437a” and insert in lieu thereof “.”
Delaware Strong Families v. Biden, 34 F. Supp. 3d 381 (D. Del. 2014). “at 869-870 (citing 2 U.S.C. § 437a (repealed by Pub.L. 94-283, § 105 , 90 Stat.”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003). “2d 821, 832 (CADC 1975) (en banc) (per curiam) (invalidating 2 U.S.C. § 437a (1970 ed., Supp. V)). No appeal was taken from that holding.”
Am. Civil Liberties Union v. New Jersey Election Law Enf't Comm'n, 509 F. Supp. 1123 (D.N.J. 1981). “1975), which was not appealed to the Supreme Court, struck down section 308 of FECA, 2 U.S.C. § 437a, which provides: Any person .”
Aclu of Nj v. Nj Elec. Law Enf. Com'n, 509 F. Supp. 1123 (D.N.J. 1981). “1975), which was not appealed to the Supreme Court, struck down section 308 of FECA, 2 U.S.C. § 437a, which provides: Any person .”
— 2 U.S.C. § 437a(l) — 1 case
Buckley v. Valeo, 519 F.2d 821 (D.C. Cir. 1975). “In the light of this scrutiny, we do find one section, 2 U.S.C. § 437a, unconstitutional on First Amendment right of association and free speech grounds.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.