2 U.S.C. § 437e
Repealed. Pub. L. 96–187, title I, § 105(1), Jan. 8, 1980, 93 Stat. 1354
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1979–2008 · leading case: Fieger v. United States Attorney Gen., 542 F.3d 1111 (6th Cir. 2008).
Fieger v. United States Attorney Gen., 542 F.3d 1111 (6th Cir. 2008). “2 U.S.C. § 437e(b)(1). The FEC has “exclusive jurisdiction with respect to the civil enforcement” of the Act.”
Beam v. Gonzales, 548 F. Supp. 2d 596 (N.D. Ill. 2008). “In fact, the FEC’s power to initiate civil actions is “the exclusive civil remedy for the enforcement of the provisions of this Act.” 2 U.S.C. § 437d(e).”
Walther v. Stewart, 474 F. Supp. 1051 (D.D.C. 1979). “The primary enforcement of the election laws is entrusted, by statute, to the Federal Election Commission, 2 U.S.C. § 437e(b)(l); private citizens are permitted to participate in that process in three ways, none of which involve direct suits against alleged violators of the law.”
Faucher v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 708 F. Supp. 9 (D. Me. 1989). “Advisory opinions “shall ” be rendered “not later than 60 days” after a written request.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 437e(a)(1) — 1 case
Beam v. Gonzales, 548 F. Supp. 2d 596 (N.D. Ill. 2008). “In fact, the FEC’s power to initiate civil actions is “the exclusive civil remedy for the enforcement of the provisions of this Act.” 2 U.S.C. § 437d(e).”
— 2 U.S.C. § 437e(b) — 1 case
Faucher v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 708 F. Supp. 9 (D. Me. 1989). “Advisory opinions “shall ” be rendered “not later than 60 days” after a written request.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 437e(b)(1) — 1 case
Fieger v. United States Attorney Gen., 542 F.3d 1111 (6th Cir. 2008). “2 U.S.C. § 437e(b)(1). The FEC has “exclusive jurisdiction with respect to the civil enforcement” of the Act.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 437e(b)(l) — 1 case
Walther v. Stewart, 474 F. Supp. 1051 (D.D.C. 1979). “The primary enforcement of the election laws is entrusted, by statute, to the Federal Election Commission, 2 U.S.C. § 437e(b)(l); private citizens are permitted to participate in that process in three ways, none of which involve direct suits against alleged violators of the law.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.