2 U.S.C. § 455

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 2 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1977–2022 · leading case: United States v. James J. Curran, Jr., 20 F.3d 560 (3rd Cir. 1994).
United States v. James J. Curran, Jr., 20 F.3d 560 (3rd Cir. 1994). · cites it 5× “We reject, however, the defendant’s contention that the three-year statute of limitations in the Federal Election Campaign Act, 2 U.S.C. § 455 (a),' applies to the offenses for which defendant was convicted under 18 U.”
United States v. Hankin, Perch, Perch P. Hankin, 607 F.2d 611 (3rd Cir. 1979). · cites it 2× “On February 9, 1979, a four count information was filed against Hankin, charging him with illegally making four campaign contributions in the names of Dante and Mary Iacampo and Harry and Lois Hilger.”
United States v. Claude C. Wild, Jr., 551 F.2d 418 (D.C. Cir. 1977). “The particular statute of limitations which concerns us here provides in pertinent part: No person shall be prosecuted, tried, or punished for any violation of . . . section 610 .”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. James Toledano, 317 F.3d 939 (9th Cir. 2003). “2 U.S.C. § 455 (a) (emphasis added). Once again, Toledano would have us ignore the language of the statute, which refers unmistakably to criminal prosecutions.”
United States v. Jerry Meeker, 701 F.2d 685 (7th Cir. 1983). “The Wild court considered whether the limitations period pertaining to illegal campaign contributions, 2 U.S.C. § 455 (a) (Supp. V 1975) , was a jurisdictional bar.”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. T. Bertram Lance, 617 F.2d 365 (5th Cir. 1980). “The period of limitations on which Lance bases his argument is set out in 2 U.S.C. § 455 (a): No person shall be prosecuted, tried or punished for any violation of subchapter I of this chapter [including section 441b] unless the indictment is found or the information is…”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Nat'l Right to Work Comm., Inc., 916 F. Supp. 10 (D.D.C. 1996). “4 Proceedings by Environmental Protection Agency to impose civil penalties under Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.”
Chang v. Vanderwielen (W.D. Wash. 2022). “28 2 U.S.C. § 455 (b)(1). Pursuant to 28 U.S.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.