20 U.S.C. § 1708

Jurisdiction of district courts

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 20 CasesGoogle Scholar

The appropriate district court of the United States shall have and exercise jurisdiction of proceedings instituted under section 1706 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1980–2010 · leading case: United States v. Texas.
United States v. Texas (5th Cir. 2010). “See 20 U.S.C. § 1708 (“The appropriate district court of the United States shall have and exercise jurisdiction of proceedings instituted under [this statute].”
Brown v. Califano (D.C. Cir. 1980). “20 U.S.C. § 1708 (1976) (Attorney General may intervene in suits brought by individuals denied equal educational opportunities); 20 U.”
Anderson v. Banks (S.D. Ga. 1981). “Defendants have strenuously argued that the plaintiffs’ case is basically a challenge to an academic program and academic regulations, which, in the absence of a bad motive, are not subject to judicial scrutiny. As support they cite Mahavongsanan v.”
Stanley v. Darlington Cnty. Sch. Dist. (D.S.C. 1995). “20 U.S.C. § 1708 (emphasis added). Since “the proceedings instituted under Section 1706” expressly contemplate state entities as defendants, the court finds that this is the kind of “unmistakable” language that suffices to show Congress’ intent that the Eleventh Amendment should…”
United States v. Texas (E.D. Tex. 2008). “20 U.S.C. § 1708 . Instead, Defendants object that Intervenors improperly filed their Motion for Further Relief under the Modified Order when In-tervenors’ claim is exclusively an EEOA claim.”
Teresa P. v. Berkeley Unified Sch. Dist. (N.D. Cal. 1989). “The Court has jurisdiction over this case under 20 U.S.C. § 1708 ; 28 U.S.C. §§ 1343 (a)(3) and (4); 28 U.”
United States v. State of Texas (5th Cir. 2010). “See 20 U.S.C. § 1708 (“The appropriate district court of the United States shall have and exercise jurisdiction of proceedings instituted under [this statute].”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.