20 U.S.C. § 1716
Voluntary adoption of remedies
Nothing in this subchapter prohibits an educational agency from proposing, adopting, requiring, or implementing any plan of desegregation, otherwise lawful, that is at variance with the standards set out in this subchapter nor shall any court, department, or agency of the United States be prohibited from approving implementation of a plan which goes beyond what can be required under this subchapter, if such plan is voluntarily proposed by the appropriate educational agency.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1997–2008 · leading case: Bd. of Educ., Joliet Tp. v. Bd. of Educ., 897 N.E.2d 756 (Ill. 2008).
Bd. of Educ., Joliet Tp. v. Bd. of Educ., 897 N.E.2d 756 (Ill. 2008). “What the EEOA does provide is that if the state or an “educational agency” does take a discriminatory action or has taken a discriminatory action in the past that these “agencies” may either take voluntary steps to remedy the past discrimination ( 20 U.S.C. §1716 (2000)) or in…”
United States v. Yonkers Bd. of Educ., 984 F. Supp. 687 (S.D.N.Y. 1997). “However, § 1713 provides no impediment to the Order entered herewith because the Court further finds that the remedies set forth in §§ 1713(a)-(e), have been utilized to the extent practicable in the YPS and that implementation of such remedies alone without the further…”
Bd. of Educ., Joliet Twp. High Sch. Dist. No. 204 v. Bd. of Educ., Lincoln Way Cmty. High Sch. Dist. No. 210 (Ill. 2008). “What the EEOA does provide is that if the state or an “educational agency” does take a discriminatory action or has taken a discriminatory action in the past that these “agencies” may either take voluntary steps to remedy the past discrimination ( 20 U.S.C. §1716 (2000)) or in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.