20 U.S.C. § 790

Repealed. Pub. L. 91–346, § 5(d)(3)(B), July 20, 1970, 84 Stat. 445

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 20 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Sharon Digre, for Herself & as Parent & Next Friend on Behalf of Sean Digre, a Minor v. Roseville Schs. Indep. Dist. No. 623, 841 F.2d 245 (8th Cir. 1988). “Subsection 1415(f) provides: Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to restrict or limit the rights, pro *250 cedures, and remedies available under the Constitution, title V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 [ 20 U.S.C.A. § 790 , et seq.], or other Federal statutes…”
Moubry Ex Rel. Moubry v. Indep. Sch. Dist. 696, 9 F. Supp. 2d 1086 (D. Minnesota 1998). “As amended, the IDEA provides: Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to restrict or limit the rights, procedures, and remedies available under the Constitution, Title V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 [ 20 U.S.C.A. § 790 , et seq.], or other Federal statutes protecting…”
Dohmen Ex Rel. Dohmen v. Twin Rivers Pub. Sch., 207 F. Supp. 2d 972 (D. Neb. 2002). “Subsection 1415(f) provides: Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to restrict or limit the rights, procedures, and remedies available under the Constitution, title V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 [ 20 U.S.C.A. § 790 , et seq.], or other Federal statutes protecting the…”
Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 283 v. S.D. Ex Rel. J.D., 948 F. Supp. 860 (D. Minnesota 1995). “By amendment in 1986, Section 1415(f), the IDEA was modified to read: Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to restrict or limit the rights, procedures, and remedies available under the Constitution, title V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 [ 20 U.S.C.A. § 790 , et seq.],…”
GRACE B. v. Lexington Sch. Comm., 762 F. Supp. 416 (D. Mass. 1991). “The amendment provides, Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to restrict or limit the rights, procedures, and remedies available under the Constitution, title V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 [ 20 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.