21 U.S.C. § 674
Federal court jurisdiction of enforcement and injunction proceedings and other kinds of cases; limitations of section 607(e) of this title
The United States district courts, the District Court of Guam, the District Court of the Virgin Islands, the highest court of American Samoa, and the United States courts of the other Territories, are vested with jurisdiction specifically to enforce, and to prevent and restrain violations of, this chapter, and shall have jurisdiction in all other kinds of cases arising under this chapter, except as provided in section 607(e) of this title.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1978–2017 · leading case: Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc., 436 U.S. 307 (1978).
Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc., 436 U.S. 307 (1978). “, 21 U. S. C. § 674 (meat product inspection); 21 U.”
Utica Packing Co. & David Fenster v. John R. Block, Sec'y, United States Dep't of Agric., 781 F.2d 71 (6th Cir. 1986). “The effect of withdrawing inspection was to debar Utica from engaging in the meat products business so long as Fenster was associated with the company.”
United States v. Kil Soo Lee, 472 F.3d 638 (9th Cir. 2006). “§ 467c (poultry inspection); 21 U.S.C. § 674 (meat inspection); 49 U.S.”
Wyszynski Provision Co. v. Sec'y of Agric., 538 F. Supp. 361 (E.D. Pa. 1982). “This court has jurisdiction under 21 U.S.C. § 674 and 28 U.S.C. § 1331 . Before us are cross-motions for summary judgment on undisputed facts.”
Am. Tel. & Tel. Co. v. M/V Cape Fear, 763 F. Supp. 97 (D.N.J. 1991). “Similarly, Touche Ross, supra, did not find evidence of a private right implied under § 17(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,15 U.”
Tennessee Valley Ham Co., Inc. v. Bergland, 493 F. Supp. 1007 (W.D. Tenn. 1980). “The jurisdiction of this Court is properly invoked under 21 U.S.C. § 674 . Plaintiff seeks judicial review of agency action under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.”
Utica Packing Co. v. Bergland, 511 F. Supp. 655 (E.D. Mich. 1981). “This court has jurisdiction of plaintiffs’ appeal from the administrative decision under 21 U.S.C. § 674 , 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and § 2201, and 5 U.”
United States v. William Aossey, Jr., 854 F.3d 453 (8th Cir. 2017). “The issue joined on appeal is whether two provisions of the Meat Inspection Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 674 and 607(e), removed this case from the district court’s jurisdiction.”
United States v. Lee (9th Cir. 2006). “§ 467c (poultry inspection); 21 U.S.C. § 674 (meat inspection); 49 U.S.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.