25 U.S.C. § 1753

Omitted

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar

[omitted]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1986–2018 · leading case: Dark-Eyes v. Comm'r of Revenue Servs., 887 A.2d 848 (Conn. 2006).
Dark-Eyes v. Comm'r of Revenue Servs., 887 A.2d 848 (Conn. 2006). “See 25 U.S.C. § 1753 . 30 Therefore, any subsequent claim to tribal title would have to arise as a result of some other grant under the settlement act or some circumstance after the passage of the settlement act, neither of which exists.”
Carcieri v. Kempthorne, 497 F.3d 15 (1st Cir. 2005). “25 U.S.C. § 1753 (b). At the same time, the Act provides that certain land and natural resources “located within the settlement lands shall be held in trust by the United States for the benefit of the Tribe,” id.”
Carcieri v. Norton, 290 F. Supp. 2d 167 (D.R.I. 2003). “25 U.S.C. § 1753 . In exchange, the act, inter alia, established a fund designed primarily to acquire private lands on behalf of the tribe.”
Mashantucket Pequot Tribe v. McGuigan, 626 F. Supp. 245 (D. Conn. 1986). “See 25 U.S.C. §§ 1753 ,1754, 1759. The implementation of these laws completed the settlement of the noted lawsuit.”
Connecticut ex rel. Blumenthal v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 228 F.3d 82 (2d Cir. 2000). “See 25 U.S.C. § 1753 . In exchange, the Settlement Act: (1) provided for federal recognition of the Tribe, see id.”
Carcieri v. Kempthorne, 497 F.3d 15 (1st Cir. 2007). “25 U.S.C. § 1753 (b). At the same time, the Act provides that certain land and natural resources "located within the settlement lands shall be held in trust by the United States for the benefit of the Tribe," id.”
Bay Mills Indian Cmty. v. Snyder, 372 F. Supp. 3d 570 (W.D. Mich. 2018). “§ 1753 (b)(8) ("Land or natural resources acquired under this subsection which are located outside of the settlement lands shall be held in fee by the Mashantucket Pequot Tribe, and the United States shall have no further trust responsibility with respect to such land and nature…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.